GLUV Corp (fka GVRP)

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Live Updating

Older

Mr. Bill

04/13/12 9:42 PM

Post #4,278

Re: #4,240: @garrett800ca - Man, I keep thinking what I would have

It's not certain that you would have been able to sell all of those shares however. HateMMs made $500K but still had some open orders that never filled if I recall correctly.

akula682

10/06/11 9:41 AM

Post #4,277

Re: #4,242: @garrett800ca - I don't know how your broker could have

Its been a while since ive been here but...

Ameritrade flat out refused to pay me when i sold my shares, they gave them back to me and refused to answer my emails, once they found out why i was calling they refused to answer my calls... they really screwed me over on this one.

hatemms

04/12/11 11:38 PM

Post #4,276

Re: #4,264: @garrett800ca - I'll never forget it, hatemm's made $500,000 from

Yeah the good old days.....

garrett800ca

11/05/10 1:32 PM

Post #4,275

Re: #4,274: @fung_derf - Yep. It's my secret mission to give money

I'm just saying it makes no sense, not saying you're lying. Maybe you were just unlucky and the only one who sold & got reversed. I guess it's possible. I could really give a rat's behind anyway, this has been over for years and I've moved on to other opportunities as I'm sure you have as well.

We have an official death certificate so, "RIP GVRP!"

fung_derf

11/05/10 1:23 PM

Post #4,274

Re: #4,273: @garrett800ca - Nope, it doesn't make sense when no one

Yep. It's my secret mission to give money back to the brokerages. I'm funding Wall St.

garrett800ca

11/05/10 1:12 PM

Post #4,273

Re: #4,272: @fung_derf - LOL! Why in heck would I lie? Yes,

Nope, it doesn't make sense when no one else's trade was reversed (that I know of). I guess you were the only one.

fung_derf

11/05/10 12:58 PM

Post #4,272

Re: #4,268: @garrett800ca - No, what I was saying is that he

LOL! Why in heck would I lie? Yes, I made the whole story up. With all the garbage told on Ihub, and my story of having a trade reversed is the one that doesn't make sense to you?

Stock

11/04/10 9:01 PM

Post #4,271

Re: #4,270: @garrett800ca - Doesn't matter a hill of beans to me

Like I said, GVRP, RIP!

garrett800ca

11/04/10 9:00 PM

Post #4,270

Re: #4,269: @Stock - I have no reason to doubt his claims

Doesn't matter a hill of beans to me either. Over and out!

Stock

11/04/10 8:56 PM

Post #4,269

Re: #4,268: @garrett800ca - No, what I was saying is that he

I have no reason to doubt his claims at all. I can see a lot of reasons why a trader wouldn't want to reveal who they access the markets through.

Derfie probably is one of those "dark pool" trader guys lol.

Seriously, no anger or emotions on my end here, just letting water go under the bridge, and now on to the next scam lol

garrett800ca

11/04/10 8:49 PM

Post #4,268

Re: #4,267: @Stock - Was he reversed out 5 years later? No way.

No, what I was saying is that he still won't reveal who his broker was even 5 years later. And we are supposed to believe he was the only guy who got reversed? His story just doesn't wash, that's all.

Stock

11/04/10 8:43 PM

Post #4,267

Re: #4,266: @garrett800ca - Yes. I can't believe Fung's broker really

Was he reversed out 5 years later? No way.

I don't think he said that at all.

I think he's saying he sold, and the trade was reversed shortly after that.

Your broker only has 365 days to bust a trade. That's the law.

garrett800ca

11/04/10 8:07 PM

Post #4,266

Re: #4,265: @Stock - You were with Ameritrade, if I remember right?

Yes. I can't believe Fung's broker really did that. Everyone I know who sold got the money, and he's the only one who won't tell us who his broker was 5 YEARS LATER!! Please, there is no way they could reverse the trades, they were good and valid based on the rules. X date was there, if my broker wanted blood from me I would have said go talk to Media Magic. They were the ones trying to pull a fast one on shareholders and sadly for them it backfired!

Stock

11/04/10 8:05 PM

Post #4,265

Re: #4,264: @garrett800ca - I'll never forget it, hatemm's made $500,000 from

You were with Ameritrade, if I remember right?

garrett800ca

11/04/10 8:01 PM

Post #4,264

Re: #4,259: @Stock - the brokerage = IB? AMTD? who?

I'll never forget it, hatemm's made $500,000 from this. And he got the money and disappeared from ihub after that lol. I made $5,000, and the trade was good so my broker couldn't really do anything. My investment to get that was 50 bucks, it was my one and only 100 bagger!

fung_derf

11/04/10 4:23 PM

Post #4,263

Re: #4,262: @Stock - I recall your angst over this very, very

LOL! You asked.

Stock

11/04/10 3:13 PM

Post #4,262

Re: #4,260: @fung_derf - I druther not say. However, to say the

I recall your angst over this very, very old topic. I can't believe we are still discussing this, but so be it...

I posted my worthless AMTD position here the other day. I figured nobody would care at this point. And it was tiny anyway.

I was one of those people with the large weekend positive balance. As you know, this created a net capital rule problem for AMTD. They had to get relief from that.

fung_derf

11/04/10 3:02 PM

Post #4,260

Re: #4,259: @Stock - the brokerage = IB? AMTD? who?

I druther not say. However, to say the day went from happy to not so much was an understatement. Nothing gives you pause like seeing your stock showing a negative $999,999,999. I thought I might have to sell my island to cover.

Stock

11/04/10 2:52 PM

Post #4,259

Re: #4,258: @fung_derf - Which one what? All of it.

the brokerage = IB? AMTD? who?

I think I remember reading that at least one USA AMTD customer sold and I never read that anybody had any problem.

"hatemms" is Canadian, and I'm sure he sold, based on his constant bragging that he did.

fung_derf

11/04/10 2:45 PM

Post #4,258

Re: #4,257: @Stock - which one?

Which one what? All of it.

Stock

11/04/10 2:41 PM

Post #4,257

Re: #4,256: @fung_derf - I did sell and the brokerage charged them

which one?

fung_derf

11/04/10 2:39 PM

Post #4,256

Re: #4,255: @Stock - I think I was one of them. I

I did sell and the brokerage charged them back to me.

Stock

11/04/10 1:56 PM

Post #4,255

Re: #4,254: @garrett800ca - I guess the fear mongers got to me

I think I was one of them. I was afraid to sell. Susie and I both were in the same little rowboat.

garrett800ca

11/04/10 1:54 PM

Post #4,254

Re: #4,253: @Stock - half would have been great. that way, if

I guess the fear mongers got to me that day. I was very new to trading and really didn't know what I was doing. But I don't think anyone really knew what to do that day, experienced or not. Such a weird situation that stock was.

Stock

11/04/10 1:52 PM

Post #4,253

Re: #4,252: @garrett800ca - Just wish I had sold all my shares

half would have been great. that way, if the worst comes, you have you other half to cover with.

garrett800ca

11/04/10 1:51 PM

Post #4,252

Re: #4,251: @Stock - Your broker will remove them eventually; AMTD still

Just wish I had sold all my shares that day instead of just 10% of them, don't know what I was thinking!

Stock

11/04/10 1:48 PM

Post #4,251

Re: #4,250: @garrett800ca - MAMG still shows up in my account, 166

Your broker will remove them eventually; AMTD still shows my tiny 200 shares.

garrett800ca

11/04/10 1:46 PM

Post #4,250

Re: #4,249: @Stock - Well, sadly, I was correct.

MAMG still shows up in my account, 166 shares. I knew 5 years ago when the thing happened that it would never trade again.

Stock

11/04/10 1:41 PM

Post #4,249

Re: #4,248: @albundy - :(

Well, sadly, I was correct.

Schuster was indicted on another fraud scheme - eight felony counts #msg-53972583

Posted by: Generic
Friday, July 06, 2007 6:36:12 AM
Re: Jim Bishop post# 138495
#msg-20999616

...long story short -- they moved the mamg assets to prmd pedg without shareholder approval (and how could they get approval from mamg s/h anyway? lol).

and you know as sure as the day is long mamg will never trade again

albundy

11/04/10 1:18 PM

Post #4,248

Re: #4,246: @Stock - Farewell: MAMG 200

Stock

10/29/10 10:02 AM

Post #4,247

Re: #4,246: @Stock - Farewell: MAMG 200

Lest We Forget...

Stock

10/29/10 9:44 AM

Post #4,246

Farewell:

MAMG 200 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.85 -- -- -- -- 0.00 -- -- -570.00 -100.00

Recent MAMG transactions    Record voluntary corporate action adjustments    
      Long positions     
  
 Date Transaction Qty Cost adjust. Cumulative shares Cumulative cost     
 07/08/05 Name/Symbol Change >> 379896202 (GVRP) to >>> 58440Y101 (MAMG) 600,000,000 520.99 600,000,000 520.99

SECURITY DELETIONS

Dl Date Symbol Company Name Effective Date/Comments

10/25/2010 MAMG Media Magic, Inc. Common Stock 10/26/2010 Inactive Security**

http://www.otcbb.com/asp/dailylist_search.asp?SearchSymbolForm=TRUE&OTCBB=ALL&searchby=symbol&searchfor=mamg&searchwith=Starting

Mr. Bill

09/01/10 8:57 PM

Post #4,245

Posted by: Generic Date: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:51:59 PM
In reply to: Generic who wrote msg# 229752 Post # of 229756

re: PrimEdge - I missed this. ROYAL PALM read carefully... and think back... WAAAAY back to this time frame -- Royal Palm, Royal Palm, Royal Palm.... GVRP! MAMG!

Insurer to Pay Bulk of $900K Settlement in Nebraska Fraud Case

By Josh Funk
July 23, 2009

A group of more than 200 investors who believe they were defrauded by their Nebraska-based brokers will share roughly $900,000 in a settlement with one of their brokers' former employers. The company's insurer, Quanta Specialty Lines Insurance Co., will pay most of that amount.

But this latest settlement, approved by a federal judge, is a relatively small part of the legal battle being waged by former clients of Rebecca Engle and Brian Schuster.

Engle and Schuster have pleaded not guilty to eight felony counts of securities fraud. Several lawsuits and arbitration claims have been filed against them and their former employers accusing Engle and Schuster of improperly selling risky investments.

Court documents filed in the lawsuits and criminal complaints say investors were defrauded out of at least $20 million.

Most of the investors involved in the arbitration or lawsuits wanted conservative, stable investments with little risk because they were nearing retirement age or were already retired when they got involved with Engle and Schuster. They say the brokers instead invested their money in high-risk enterprises in Florida and never fully explained the risks.

Engle and Schuster, a former Nebraska football player, worked together in Nebraska City at times between 2000 and 2007. The brokers were affiliated with at least three different companies - Capital Growth Financial LLC, Wachovia Securities LLC and VSR Financial Services Inc. - during those years.

The investments at issue were sold when Engle and Schuster worked for Capital Growth.

The class-action settlement that gained preliminary approval is between the investors and Capital Growth along with two of the firm's former executives, Alan and Michael Jacobs. Florida attorney Neil Baritz, who represents the defunct Capital Growth and the Jacobses, did not immediately respond to a message.

The settlement terms were listed as confidential in U.S. District Court in Nebraska. But a copy of the settlement was filed in a related case in Florida, where Capital Growth was trying to collect from its insurer, Quanta Specialty Lines Insurance Co.

According to those court documents, Quanta will pay $646,160 to the class-action plaintiffs and another $93,840 to a specific investor who won an arbitration claim against Capital Growth. Separately, the Jacobses will pay $170,000 in a different arbitration claim.

Quanta also agreed to pay $230,000 in legal fees related to the defense of Capital Growth and the Jacobses.

This settlement does not represent the end of the case because several other defendants in the class-action lawsuit have not settled or admitted wrongdoing. And resolving some of the lawsuits or arbitration claims only generates additional litigation. For example, a May settlement with VSR gave investors the right to sue that company's insurer, AIG, in an effort to collect $10.3 million.

"This is a very small piece of the overall puzzle," said J.L. Spray, one of the attorneys representing the investors.

The investors say Engle and Schuster sold securities in two Florida companies, American Capital Corp. and Royal Palm. According to court documents, Engle and Schuster described the companies in glowing terms, but they were actually high-risk investments.

Both companies were bought by PrimEdge Inc., and Schuster became president and chief executive of PrimEdge.

garrett800ca

05/17/10 9:33 AM

Post #4,244

Re: #4,243: @TEX - That happened about a month after I started

It wasn't long after I first started trading too. I just wish I'd bet the farm on it!!

TEX

05/17/10 2:10 AM

Post #4,243

Re: #4,242: @garrett800ca - I don't know how your broker could have

That happened about a month after I started trading...lol, quite a learning curve in short timeframe.

garrett800ca

05/16/10 12:45 AM

Post #4,242

Re: #4,241: @fung_derf - You were very lucky. My brokerage reversed the

I don't know how your broker could have done that, those trades were valid, the ex date was there for all to see and we played by the rules. It wasn't your fault that the company's attempt to majorly screw all their shareholders completely backfired on them. (Forget about the money, that part was really sweet!)

Remember the PR the company put out that weekend "Don't trade these shares!"? Haha, yeah 'don't trade these shares' now that the company was the one getting screwed instead of all their shareholders.... As far as I'm concerned those arrogant bastards got exactly what they deserved!

I wish this type of thing could happen more often in the markets, a real opportunity for the little guy to get some retribution.

fung_derf

05/13/10 11:10 AM

Post #4,241

Re: #4,240: @garrett800ca - Man, I keep thinking what I would have

You were very lucky. My brokerage reversed the trade after I profited by $30k. They showed me about a billion dollars short instead.

garrett800ca

05/13/10 10:47 AM

Post #4,240

Man, I keep thinking what I would have walked away with if I'd put $50K into this. The return was 100:1 so I would have made $4,950,000. AND I would have gotten the money because Ameritrade had to pay those trades. Send me back in a time machine please!

albundy

01/27/10 10:50 AM

Post #4,239

Re: #4,238: @garrett800ca - Still 166 shares showing up in my account.

yup, damn 20/20 hindsight. ;)

garrett800ca

01/26/10 1:31 PM

Post #4,238

Still 166 shares showing up in my account. But MAMG is now listed as "symbol not found". Should have sold those damn shares when they were worth billions, LOL.

PDC ™

11/18/09 8:12 PM

Post #4,237

Re: #4,233: @pontius - stopping by to the sweep the floor in

Man havent seen you in like 3 years. Hope your not dead.

akula682

11/14/08 11:51 AM

Post #4,236

Re: #4,232: @garrett800ca - I looked back at my records on this.

Ameritrade would not let me sell mine... you folks got lucky, i'm happy for ya.

garrett800ca

11/11/08 1:28 AM

Post #4,235

Re: #4,234: @Art2Gecko - thanks.. it's been a little dusty lately.

I STILL have these damn shares in my account, MAMG. I think they are worth .02 LOL.

Art2Gecko

11/10/08 11:34 PM

Post #4,234

Re: #4,233: @pontius - stopping by to the sweep the floor in

thanks.. it's been a little dusty lately.

pontius

11/10/08 10:48 PM

Post #4,233

stopping by to the sweep the floor in the place. was in the neighborhood

garrett800ca

06/01/08 12:45 PM

Post #4,232

I looked back at my records on this. Apparently, I sold 10% of what I had that day, for a $4,500 profit. Could have been a $50,000 profit if I had sold all the shares that day.

At least I made something, most people on here couldn't sell because their broker wouldn't let them. I had Ameritrade and they ended up honoring all the trades.

I had scibbled down on my notes that "HateMM's" had a $5,000 initial investment and sold all his shares for a profit of $500,000.....NICE!!

TEX

05/31/08 11:25 AM

Post #4,231

Re: #4,227: @Wayne R - CAMU was a small forward split 3 or

Wow, looked it up:

CAMU then CANU then CAUO then LFGN then LFGT then LFGC then NNJT and now (as of Jan 08) HITR; apparently, hasn't traded since November.

You definitely caught the right wave...

IRISHBULL

05/31/08 11:20 AM

Post #4,230

Re: #4,229: @OTC BB King - Yeah, I think it was either the last

Yes, and sweated it out for weeks until Ameritrade said the sell cleared.

http://www.finitesite.com/irishbull/mytunes.html

OTC BB King

05/31/08 11:16 AM

Post #4,229

Re: #4,228: @IRISHBULL - Has it been 3 years already? Time flies!

Yeah, I think it was either the last week in May or the first week in June... what a roller coaster ride! You were able to sell some if I recall... correct?

IRISHBULL

05/31/08 11:10 AM

Post #4,228

Re: #4,210: @OTC BB King - Are we coming up on the 3 year

Has it been 3 years already? Time flies! I remember that Monday very well, was doing a snoopy dance ;)

Older

GLUV Corp (fka GVRP)

Followers	35	Posters	146
Posts (Today)	0	Posts (Total)	4278
Created	08/11/04	Type	Free
Moderators

GLUV Corp. Announces Entry Into the Entertainment Industry Tuesday May 17, 10:25 am ET WEST PALM BEACH, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 17, 2005--GLUV Corp. (Pink Sheets:GVRP - News), announced today it has finalized a Merger Agreement with DigiKidz Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation. GLUV Corp. has also filed with the State of Florida to change its name to Media Magic, Inc. after effecting the Merger. The transaction requires all current officers and directors of GLUV to resign, and provides for the appointment of the Media Magic management team to their appropriate positions in the new company. After effecting the merger, Gerald C. Parker and Robert W. Pearce will serve on the Board of Directors of the new entity, Gerald C. Parker as Chairman of the Board, and Robert W. Pearce as Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of Media Magic. Media Magic owns and operates two wholly owned subsidiaries, DigiKidz, Inc. and Orangebox Entertainment, Inc. DigiKidz is a leading producer, developer, distributor and eCommerce retailer of a range of personalized videos, books, CDs and music for the children's marketplace. Orangebox, located in Hollywood, California, is an innovative company that provides the next generation of multimedia services ranging from Production to Post Production for the entertainment industry. Its services include audio, visual, editorial, and music from inception to completion. Media Magic, Inc.'s Chairman, Gerald C. Parker, commented: "We are excited about our current prospects and look forward to developing Media Magic Inc. into an innovative, well-rounded leader in the entertainment industry through several acquisitions." Media Magic Inc., formerly known as DigiKidz Holdings, Inc., was founded in November 2004 and is headquartered in West Palm Beach, Florida. The Company conducts operations through its two wholly owned subsidiaries, DigiKidz, Inc., Jupiter, Florida, and Orangebox Entertainment, Inc., Hollywood, California. Media Magic acquired DigiKidz in November 2004 and Orangebox Entertainment (formerly Archetype Entertainment) in May 2005. Media Magic's strategy is to further develop its subsidiaries' leadership in their specific entertainment industry market segments and to develop the natural synergies between them. For further information on Media Magic, please call: Dennis Ruggeri at (561) 820-2444. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Little bit of info for folks happening upon this board wondering WTF is going on... http://www.otcbb.com/asp/dividend.asp?sym_id=GVRP&dDate=05/13/2005&sDateType=Record_date GVRP - GLUV Corporation New Common Stock Declaration Date: Ex Date:05/23/2005 Record Date:05/13/2005 Payment Date:05/20/2005 Dividend Type: Stock Dividend or Split Dividend Amount: 3,000,000-1 stk Notes: Due Bill Redeemable Date: 05/25/2005 A few Terms: ex-date Definition 1 For stock splits, the date that the share price changes to reflect the split. Definition 2 For dividends, the first day of the ex-dividend period. The ex-date was created to allow all pending transactions to be completed before the record date. If an investor does not own the stock before the ex-date, he or she will be ineligible for the dividend payout. Further, for all pending transactions that have not been completed by the ex-date, the exchanges automatically reduce the price of the stock by the amount of the dividend. This is done because a dividend payout automatically reduces the value of the company (it comes from the company's cash reserves), and the investor would have to absorb that reduction in value (because neither the buyer nor the seller are eligible for the dividend). also called ex-dividend date. http://www.investorwords.com/1817/ex_date.html record date Date, set by the issuing in order to be eligible to receive a declared dividend or capital gains distribution. The date is also used by the NASD to set the ex-dividend date. also called date of record. http://www.investorwords.com/4095/record_date.html payment date The date on which a dividend, mutual fund distribution, or bond interest payment is made or scheduled to be made. also called distribution date. http://www.investorwords.com/3635/payment_date.html

Board Info

Posts Today	0
Posts (Total)	4278
Posters	146
Moderators

New Post

Volume
Day Range:
Bid Price
Ask Price
Last Trade Time:

Boards:

Quotes:

Boards

News

Market Data

Markets

Discover

Discover

Boards:

Quotes:

GLUV Corp (fka GVRP)

GLUV Corp (fka GVRP)

Join the InvestorsHub Community

GLUV Corp (fka GVRP)

Board Info