Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Just curious Grip, if the price was $3 right now and you were back in, would you continue to offer your negative speculation, or is that when you change your tune and talk up the science again? I mean you have to push it up to flip again. Then talk it back down. It’s hard to keep track. But thank you so much for saving us all from ourselves. Zero credibility.
So given the MM PII results, if they did a quick n=100 PIII trial with NEWS II as the primary endpoint, they have proven statistical significance and would be approved. Is that a blunder, or approval and revenue. We already KNOW it works on those patients.
Grip, put down Sun Tzu and spend some time reading up on the difference between Phase II and Phase III FDA trials and endpoints. It may give you a better understanding on how trials progress, and most importantly how Phase III primary endpoints are determined. ( you know, the ones used for drug approval. It’s different than a phase II trial, you know, where they find out if the drug works. ) Just a thought. Hope it helps. Good luck buddy.
Thank you Smiley, you are a good man.
Dr. Patterson seems to have a very different opinion. Given his experience with Leronlimab, I would tend to believe him. Maybe I am wrong, can you please give us your medical credentials so we may understand exactly what we are dealing with here. I am always interested in qualified opinions. Thank you in advance. Best of luck to all.
How about the millions received from exercising warrants? Does that not count as well?
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
God bless you Dr A. Your medical insights over the years have proven invaluable, but your life experience is immeasurable. Thank you as always for sharing your knowledge. Wishing you the best
There are so very many places to point blame. The real question is, what is most important, blame or solution. Given where the company is right now, I would be very interested to understand how replacing the CEO tomorrow would help us. Is there a way that could be accomplished without loosing precious time? As close as we are, do we really start over? I am just more curious, while that may drop the share price for a minute, would it really help us now? Trust me, I am aware of Our CEO’s strengths, and weaknesses, I know them for what they are. With that, what is the solution right now, given what we know or may not know. Let’s talk solutions, not complaints. Best to all.
Could not agree more. Well said!
To each his own I suppose. Some people here are literally making tens and tens of dollars daily with their technical expertise, and that is certainly one approach. Some have much greater aspirations. Others day trade, and you also have the investors, those of us here for the science. Regardless, if you are reading this, it is good to keep in mind that NO ONE, myself included, is here just for you. Anyone offering free technical advice daily has other motives, that is for certain. Some earn their way five a pop (+.95). If you are around long enough (5 years), you will learn who is who here, and most importantly who is honest. There are some amazing people here with the best of intentions, you just have to pay VERY close attention to find out who they are. Best of luck to you all!
Good thought, time for another reminder for those that are new here. Not everyone here has your best interest in mind... Do your own DD, maybe even listen to the doctors that have actually used the molecule. The science has NEVER been disputed, the rest is simply noise.
I can confirm that information is not correct. He is not in Charlotte today. If you listened to the call yesterday, you clearly heard Nader say twice that “the FDA hasn’t even seen our data yet.” Thinking that the White House has been cryptically referencing Cytodyn is asinine, as we have yet to publish our data. Be realistic and simply be patient, the data will come and THEN everyone will know.
Just to be clear, this is not Dr Patterson’s paper.
God bless you Dr M. Thank you for your time and expertise! We are so very lucky to have your input. It has certainly meant a lot to me over the years and I just wanted to let you know how much you are appreciated. Thank you
Obviously as a Health Care Executive, you clearly know that any decisions to be made regarding offers submitted to the company would be evaluated by the BOD, not Nader, he is simply one vote at the table. While I empathize and even share in some of your frustration, let’s at the very least, stay on point. Pointing the finger at Nader for execution of timelines is certainly valid, but insinuating BP is clearly not interested or that he is refusing offers or misrepresenting valuation is simply not possible. I wish you the very best.
Maybe you should take a minute to listen to the call...
Three world renown Physicians doing the talking... By far the most impressive CC I have heard in the last four years. Very impressive
Fine,
Many thanks to you, POS and your peers for your efforts. I am sure many here, including myself who find your speculation and conjecture extremely helpful! As it turns out, one of our peers was also able to reach out and get some more information regarding the situation. As it turns out, Pestell clearly understood the Board’s position and the split was amicable. He was actually very pleased to be able to retain his shares and very much looks forward to the success of the company and reaping his significant financial returns. We also found it very informative to learn that he has participated as an expert witness in past litigation cases. Very interesting, do you know if he was also a fan of watching Perry Mason? Could also turn out to be very important. As always, many thanks for your efforts! Wishing you the best...
Pardon me for jumping in, but you Sir are WAY out of line. Misiu is an amazing, compassionate, extremely intelligent PHYSICIAN who knows more about this science than you, or I, or all of your “Pharma” friends combined. Her dedication to helping others in the REAL world, and her knowledge and understanding of the science are unquestioned. It has been her life’s work. Disagreeing is one thing, but the very least you can do is to show respect for someone much more qualified than yourself. I wish you luck, but you should apologize to her for your comment. Think before you leap.
Moderators cannot remove other moderators sticky posts. I have asked for it to be removed as I completely agree with your statement. It was inappropriate.
Finesand, with all due respect, given some of your assumptions and inaccuracies, I am not sure it is prudent for you to “sticky” your thoughts or agenda on the board as fact. While we all certainly appreciate your posts and opinions, others new to the board may find it confusing and mistake it for fact. Not sure that is the appropriate use of your moderator abilities. Not fair for others who do not have that ability. Maybe your blog is a more appropriate place for that. Just my opinion. Thanks to you all and best of luck.
Dr Pestell HAS conducted HUMAN trials with another CCR5 drug that were successful. That drug unfortunately had severe side effects that were problematic when combined with chemotherapy. Leronlimab does not have such side effects, thus why he chose to stake his life’s work and reputation on its success. With all do respect, I will follow the opinion of one of the top oncologist in the world on this matter. I believe he has earned that respect.
I actually agree with your statement. Dr Pestell has clearly stated that the intent is to make cancer a manageable, chronic problem much like diabetes. Metastasis is what kills in cancer. Chemotherapy can attack and destroy tumors, it’s the spread that kills. Stopping metastasis while attacking the tumor addresses both, most importantly by not allowing the cancer cells to migrate. Hope that helps.
How enlightening. Don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story. Thank you for sharing your insight with us all. Best of luck to you-
“And it is readily apparent CYDY will execute an Reverse Split in the near to medium term. “
How prophetic, please do enlighten us with your inside knowledge. Considering the company has stated the exact opposite numerous times and would require shareholder approval to do so.
Cannot and will not happen without shareholder approval. That ship sailed last year, nonsense to even mention it.
As the Untethered Soul is able to observe from a centered place of consciousness...
Three of the greatest minds on our board. It is a shame but I certainly understand. See you all at the finish line, and a most sincere thanks for all of your contributions.
Amen. Well stated
Bush league. Find a more professional and effective way to collect your accounts receivable. You are certainly not helping your reputation this way.
Deal closed today with Pestell...
“Massive” 11 million from NIH?? Why don’t you take a second and look up what CYDY got from them. Nice try.
He is already a “significant” investor in the company. We are very fortunate to have him on the board. Putting all the pieces in place...
I doubt we will get that opportunity Tom. Pestell brings a whole different dimension of credibility. In my opinion, very soon, we will get news of a reputable Investment Bank providing the necessary funding to clean up the balance sheet, as you have mentioned many times. And the rest as they say, will be history.
Done
Godspeed Tom. Wishing you the best. See you on the other side.
Amen. And again Tom, we thank you for your service.
56.1% low dose.
With all due respect, do you think a patient dealing with the life threatening reaction and very little hope would share your viewpoint?
Tom,
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn’t ODD (HIV combo) denied because the potential size of the patient population was much greater than 200k?
It was granted for GvHD Correct?