Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I assume you meant "EXPLOSION". LMAO!!!
WRONG AGAIN! Your simple link doesn't prove the same statement isn't included in the previous 10Qs! I'm not going to waste my time posting links to each of the previous 10Qs for this year when all anyone has to do is simply look at them to see that I'm telling the truth. That's called a REAL fact! LMAO!
You have provided NO PROOF! The proof that this is OLD, OLD, OLD news can easily be found in the previous 10Qs for this year! Just try using the search option. LMAO!!!!
Pure BS again!!! All anyone has to do is look at the previous 10Q's this year to see the exact same statement. What other proof does one need??? This is OLD, OLD, OLD news!
Shorts are getting desperate AND burned! ROFLMAO!
BS! How does a time stamp prove this SAME comment wasn't including in the previous 10Q this year? All anyone has to do is look to see them! ROFLMAO
Shorts are getting desperate!
WRONG AGAIN! So, if it's not old news (timestamp is meaningless) then explain why the statement has been included in EVERY 10Q this year? LMAO!!!!
Shorts will lose another 200% in the coming weeks!
BS! Anyone can see this is OLD NEWS and has been reported in every 10-Q this year! Shorts are getting desperate! LMAO!!!
Fast forward to today??? This is OLD NEWS and has been reported in every 10-Q January 22, 2022. LMAO!!!
This is pure BS! Please show proof!
I have to laugh when I think about how the shorts refer to CYDY longs as "baggies" when we're up 200% in the last month. Clearly the shorts are the true "baggies" and they know it. Every day we get closer and closer to the short squeeze, and I think yesterday's closing above $1 was the start of it. Get out the popcorn and enjoy the show.
I've heard it referred to as something the Wyly brothers would do. But they're bankrupt billionaires and CYDY is headed back to having a $b market cap.
Because the shorts want us to think it's late.
Not sure how you came up with 68%, but shorts are now down over 100% in just three weeks, and lost more today. Ouch!
Agree, because it's already happening. Three weeks ago the sp was around .35, and today it's .70+, so shareholders are up over 100% in three weeks, and the shorts are down over 100%. So, yep, the bloodbath is unavoidable for the shorts. So sad that some shorts are being encouraged to double-down by the same shorts who are now covering.
What's missing from your comment is:
1) there's been no formal target of the so-called "criminal investigation" by the SEC/DOJ other than the company's announcement of the SEC/DOJ scrutiny over public claims about COVID-19 drug's viability (this has already been remedied)
2) the so-called "criminal investigation" is over 2 years old
3) not a single person was named in the investigation. Not NP, not Kelly, nada...
4) not a single charge nor indictment was made against any CytoDyn employee or former employee. Oh, but there is Occam's Razor LMAO!
5) multiple fronts? Not sure who's reality you're referring to.
After 4 years, apparently nothing! lol
And after two years of false accusations, there hasn't been a single charge or indictment.
Laughing and STILL waiting...
I love the way "Ockham's Razor" is constantly used to explain the unexplainable where no evidence exists. Got it! Laughing and still waiting for the "evidence".
Just as I thought. There is NO proof that "Dr. Kelly is under investigation by the SEC and DOJ". Not a single link in over two years of false accusations. It's not Dr. Kelly that needs a lawyer.
And he was at GSK for almost 30 years which means he has deep connections.
Hi Misiu,
Knowing what Dr Arman knows about potential partnerships/buyouts, I don't think he needs to set a trap because the shorts are already standing in it. He just needs to close the deal and announce it on a Friday evening after the close. Why Friday evening and not Monday morning? Well because EVERYONE will know about the partnership/buyout come Monday morning, and it could create a short squeeze unlike anything we've ever seen before. Can you imagine if the opening bid on a future Monday morning was $5-$10+ for a partnership, or $20+ for a buyout, especially if it's GSK?
Congress doesn't vote on EUAs. LMAO
BS!!! Please share any link that's showing "Dr Kelly" is under investigation by the SEC and DOJ too.
Hi Misiu. We went from .42 on Tues to .74 today, so that's a .32 increase over Tuesday's .42 sp. Therefore, we're actually up 76% in 3 days. We'll be up 100% when we hit .84.
Glaxo’s New Focus After Haleon Spinoff Shines a Light on CytoDyn as a Takeover Target
"When the clinical hold is lifted, the written-off indications the drug is being developed for (HIV, mTNBC and other cancers, COVID, MS, and NASH) will come back into play and investors will remember why, just a short time ago, investors were willing to pay up to $5-10 for this platform technology before cancer or NASH results were known. This could be an enormous value infection point, but in the meantime, the breadcrumbs show how perfect leronlimab and the corprate culture fit are for GSK. The deal makes too much sense—the fit is so ideal it cannot be ignored. This is what is capturing investors’ minds as they see the breadcrumbs. If GSK shows any interest at all it could be soon and investors are going to want to be fully loaded for this kind of surprise event."
https://insiderfinancial.com/glaxos-new-focus-after-haleon-spinoff-shines-a-light-on-cytodyn-otcmkts-cydy-as-a-takeover-target/183360/
Great post, Misiu! I stickied your post!
You agree with this statement? You think the drug doesn't work and the HIV trail was not a success meaning they faked the data from their HIV trial results and they never met the trial's end-points? You think that's the "ultimate truth"? Seriously???
"I have come to suspect they could never and will never get the BLA approved. Because their initial announcement, 4 years ago, that the HIV trial was a success, would have been a fraud IMO."
So, those are your conditions? lol
It's hilarious how some shorts are still whining about NP even though he's been gone for six months and we have a new president. They desperately need new material. UFB!!!
Yeah, it's hilarious that at the time they requested the additional shares, some think 200m shares @$1.10 is less than 350m shares @$.40. UFB!!!
So, now you agree that 350m shares will more than fund them for the short term. LOL UFB!!!
Apparently one can.
What's even funnier is when shorts have to back to 1998 to create a perceived issue with a drug. Priceless!!
Is that Sheikh guy anything like the 13-D paid basher Philip Harrison who invested $200k in Brucey Patentson's company InCellDX according to the SEC forms, and then subbmitted FOIA requests hoping to dig up some dirt on NP?
"On October 6, 2020, Phillip Harrison, one of the individuals named as Gifting Persons in the Proxy Statement, purchased secured convertible notes (“Notes”) from IncellDx. The aggregate principal amount of notes purchased by Mr. Harrison was $200,000. "
https://www.reddit.com/r/CYDY/comments/q1zt8p/received_another_update_last_night_from_fda/)
So, how much did he pay the "pumpers" and "Yes Men". Please provide a link. Laughing and waiting...
What BS!!! This drug wasn't around 20 years ago, and please list the 8+ countries where the trials failed. Apparently "Failures each time" excludes the successful HIV, mTNBC, and NASH trials. LMAO
Yeah, word must have gotten out which explains why we're up 15%! LMAO!!!
No that's funnier! Yes, it does. According to you and others over the last three years, NP was the biggest issue and things weren't going to turnaround until he was replaced. Now that he's been replaced, we're now supposed to believe things haven't' changed. Hilarious!
Yes, I agree with the float however you're not comparing apples-to-apples when you ignore future opportunities and which of the mabs has enormous potential without a single SAE.
Wrong again! A little DD on the new Prez will give you what you're missing.