SureTrader SureTrader Nadex Advertisement SureTrader
Home > Boards > US OTC > Computers - Software >

Worlds Inc (WDDD)

Add WDDD Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: quilt, jppatches
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 2/20/2017 6:13:59 PM - Followers: 238 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 4

Worlds Inc


Founded in 1994, Worlds Inc. invented and patented technology to solve problems associated with large-scale 3D multi-user environments, known as virtual worlds.

Worlds secured an early priority date by filing a provisional application with the USPTO in Nov, 1995. Within a year, Worlds filed a non-provisional patent application, claiming the priority date of their 1995 provisional application.

Worlds has pursued additional claims associated with their invention through a series of continuing patent applications, amassing a substantial patent portfolio:

Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
Nov 13, 1995 app 60/020,296 provisional
Nov 12, 1996 6,219,045 Apr 17, 2001
Aug 3, 2000 7,181,690 Feb 20, 2007
Nov 2, 2006 7,493,558 Feb 17, 2009
Jan 13, 2009 7,945,856 May 17, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,082,501 Dec 20, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,145,998 Mar 27, 2012
Apr 8, 2011 8,161,385 Apr 17, 2012
Apr 11, 2011 8,407,592 Mar 26, 2013
Jun 16, 2011 8,640,028 Jan 28, 2014

Their patent portfolio remains in force until Nov, 2016 (20 years from the filing date of their first non-provisional patent application).

Worlds v. Activision


On Mar 30, 2012, Worlds filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Activision. Worlds’ lawsuit seeks monetary damages as well as a permanent injunction barring the manufacture and sale of infringing devices. Additionally, the complaint accuses Activision of willfully infringing and seeks an award of exemplary damages, attorneys' fees, and related court costs.


Susman Godfrey is representing Worlds, without fee, unless the lawsuit is successful or is favorably settled out of court. Susman Godfrey is considered the top litigation boutique in the country. Max Tribble, lead counsel of Susman Godfrey, is the lead counsel for Worlds. Tribble has an extensive track record of patent infringement lawsuit wins and settlements for plaintiffs in lawsuits against large corporations, including:

Paltalk v. Microsoft

Mass Engineered Design v. Ergotron & Dell, et al

Sky Technologies v. Oracle

Sky Technologies v. IBM

November 30, 2016

The Unites States Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a ruling in Bungie, Inc (Developer Partner of Activision Blizzard) v. Worlds, Inc. validating certain key patent claims governing multiplayer interaction.

December 5th 2016:

Worlds (WDDD) as well owns 7.5% stake of Worlds Online, Inc. (WORX). as of 12/05/2016

December 6th 2016

Worlds Inc. (OTC QB:WDDD) is a leading intellectual property developer and licensee of patents related to 3D online virtual worlds. The Company has a portfolio of 9 US patents (6,219,045; 7,181,690; 7,493,558; 7,945,856; 8,082,501; 8,145,998; 8,161,385 8,407,592& 8,640,028) for multi-server technology in 3D applications, notably Virtual Worlds. The earliest of these patents issued on an application filed November 12, 1996. A provisional patent application, serial number 60/020,296, was filed on November 13, 1995.

These patents are related to each other and disclose and claim systems and methods for enabling users to interact in a virtual space. Worlds Inc. filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Activision Blizzard, Inc., Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and Activision Publishing, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on March 30, 2012.

Activision's World of Warcraft and Call of Duty video games have been identified in the complaint as infringing on Worlds' patents. Max L Tribble, lead counsel of Susman Godfrey L.L.P, will be lead counsel for Worlds in the suit.

The Markman hearing for the patent infringement suit by Worlds Inc. against Activision Blizzard, Inc., Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and Activision Publishing, Inc. (Activision Blizzard et al) (Nasdaq: ATVI), was held October 3, 2014 to address various aspects of the infringement suit claims and how the words in the 11 disputed 'constructions' in the claims should be construed for jury consideration. On June 26, 2015 Judge Denise Casper of the United District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled in favor of certain Worlds key definitions and interpretations governing the construction claims. Activision Blizzard the defendant in this action became “time-barred” to file an action to challenge the Patents using the only “other” venue that has the authority to disqualify the patents, The United States Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

December 6th 2016: 
Worlds current Federal Trial is on mutual consent hold pending the disposition of the validation or denial action of the PTAB. The Company's principle goal will be to continue to grow its IP portfolio, while protecting and monetizing it through patent infringement litigation. In addition, Worlds Inc. intends to be active in the creation and acquisition of related digital media technologies and patents that complement their current patent portfolio and that broaden the features, versatility and reach of the technology to allow for its utilization in the broadest possible way.

December 20th 2016

Worlds to Appeal to Federal Circuit on PTAB Rulings, Claims Marketwire   "Press Releases"
BOSTON, MA -- (Marketwired) -- 12/20/16 -- Worlds Inc. (OTCQB: WDDD) intends to file an appeal of recent Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) rulings to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding Worlds' seminal technology that has been fundamental to the development of massively multiplayer online role-playing gaming (MMORPG) into a $20-billion dollar industry. Worlds' current investors plan to exercise their warrants to fund the appeals and ongoing business operations.

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
Current Price
Bid Ask Day's Range
#24321  Sticky Note This is a good read for anybody who choo choo trader 12/22/16 10:44:58 PM
#24740   I'm using Schwab. Here's what they say: IveBeenBagged 02/20/17 06:13:59 PM
#24739   Hmm perhaps I'm wrong and should re check jppatches 02/20/17 04:23:38 PM
#24738   Fidelity. I've read a few others' info WhatNestEgg 02/20/17 04:18:15 PM
#24737   Odd I pay a fee for the "trade" jppatches 02/20/17 03:16:20 PM
#24736   Not accurate for all brokers. Some charge WhatNestEgg 02/19/17 11:08:13 PM
#24735   Great info, jp. Thanks! tradetrak 02/18/17 08:55:16 PM
#24734   If you put in an any part order jppatches 02/18/17 01:25:13 PM
#24733   I sold a bit more to move over jppatches 02/18/17 01:18:53 PM
#24732   Another game changer petition to SCOTUS on PTAB jppatches 02/18/17 01:13:56 PM
#24731   Frustrating. I've had the tiny fills where the IveBeenBagged 02/17/17 11:00:48 PM
#24730   I'm getting a little pissed about this. I've tradetrak 02/17/17 09:42:35 PM
#24729   Interesting legal ruling that is likely to be jppatches 02/17/17 08:03:34 PM
#24728   I own a bunch of NAK, hit piece jppatches 02/14/17 03:29:21 PM
#24727   throw us the ticker paymyloans 02/14/17 03:25:03 PM
#24726   I sold a bit to move money into jppatches 02/14/17 03:07:29 PM
#24725   Another dilution coming? Seems like it? Luckyus 02/14/17 02:31:09 PM
#24724   Well I put in 2 trades in 2 madprophet 02/14/17 02:06:19 PM
#24723   No, I don't think they will settle before tradetrak 02/13/17 11:10:51 PM
#24722   Well first question is what's the probability ATVI jppatches 02/13/17 03:15:27 AM
#24721   I've been running through possible settlement scenarios and tradetrak 02/12/17 11:25:05 PM
#24720   ATVI better than expected results- good for us! jppatches 02/12/17 01:44:05 PM
#24719   I sure hope ATVI is putting aside some tradetrak 02/11/17 10:17:18 PM
#24718   Not quite following what you are saying on choo choo trader 02/11/17 02:28:08 AM
#24717   Level2 is available to everyone for this on OTCMarkets WhatNestEgg 02/10/17 11:10:56 PM
#24716   That makes the assumption that everyone buying at tradetrak 02/10/17 10:42:38 PM
#24715   Could be you're witnessing the down side of tradetrak 02/10/17 10:35:03 PM
#24714   Even if they did it would be a jppatches 02/10/17 06:10:19 PM
#24713   That would be considered a major conflict of Jetta09 02/10/17 05:15:03 PM
#24712   Who can say weather Susman bought shares on Long term 02/10/17 04:22:32 PM
#24711   Perhaps I misunderstood but it seemed like you jppatches 02/10/17 03:08:40 PM
#24710   Why are you repeating yourself? I know nicklaus1 02/10/17 03:01:12 PM
#24709   What matters is the settlement value not the jppatches 02/10/17 02:42:23 PM
#24708   I understand the difference. I went to nicklaus1 02/10/17 02:36:10 PM
#24707   No jppatches 02/10/17 11:42:03 AM
#24706   they don't want to see it, that's my nicklaus1 02/09/17 11:43:01 PM
#24705   It's all tied together. Kidrin has stock nicklaus1 02/09/17 11:40:48 PM
#24704   I didn't know that, thanks for that info- jppatches 02/09/17 05:02:49 PM
#24703   OK, it's no big deal, only thing is choo choo trader 02/09/17 04:59:27 PM
#24702   The point made earlier was it was likely jppatches 02/09/17 04:34:52 PM
#24701   Well, not to argue, but why would the choo choo trader 02/09/17 04:32:02 PM
#24700   Would disagree here jppatches 02/09/17 04:15:42 PM
#24699   I suspect the 98K trade at .0275 was choo choo trader 02/09/17 04:11:52 PM
#24698   Yes I figured that after jppatches 02/09/17 03:07:35 PM
#24697   It is probably and all or none option. madprophet 02/09/17 03:01:56 PM
#24696   So far, a lot more buying today again. jppatches 02/09/17 02:42:22 PM
#24695   No they would not jppatches 02/09/17 02:38:27 PM
#24694   Was there a set date from the company garyhalvo 02/09/17 12:55:08 PM
#24693   I am wondering if ATVI is trying to nicklaus1 02/09/17 11:36:18 AM
#24692   Can anyone explain this to me jppatches 02/09/17 10:41:28 AM
#24691   I posted stats from cafc previously (look through jppatches 02/09/17 10:37:58 AM