SureTrader
Interactive Brokers Advertisement
Home > Boards > US OTC > Computers - Software >

Worlds Inc (WDDD)

WDDD RSS Feed
Add WDDD Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: Looking4BIGcash, PatentPlays
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 12/11/2017 10:52:41 PM - Followers: 245 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0


Worlds Inc

History

Founded in 1994, Worlds Inc. invented and patented technology to solve problems associated with large-scale 3D multi-user environments, known as virtual worlds.

Worlds secured an early priority date by filing a provisional application with the USPTO in Nov, 1995. Within a year, Worlds filed a non-provisional patent application, claiming the priority date of their 1995 provisional application.

Worlds has pursued additional claims associated with their invention through a series of continuing patent applications, amassing a substantial patent portfolio:

Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
Nov 13, 1995 app 60/020,296 provisional
Nov 12, 1996 6,219,045 Apr 17, 2001
Aug 3, 2000 7,181,690 Feb 20, 2007
Nov 2, 2006 7,493,558 Feb 17, 2009
Jan 13, 2009 7,945,856 May 17, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,082,501 Dec 20, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,145,998 Mar 27, 2012
Apr 8, 2011 8,161,385 Apr 17, 2012
Apr 11, 2011 8,407,592 Mar 26, 2013
Jun 16, 2011 8,640,028 Jan 28, 2014


Their patent portfolio remains in force until Nov, 2016 (20 years from the filing date of their first non-provisional patent application).

Worlds v. Activision

Complaint

On Mar 30, 2012, Worlds filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Activision. Worlds’ lawsuit seeks monetary damages as well as a permanent injunction barring the manufacture and sale of infringing devices. Additionally, the complaint accuses Activision of willfully infringing and seeks an award of exemplary damages, attorneys' fees, and related court costs.

Representation

Susman Godfrey is representing Worlds, without fee, unless the lawsuit is successful or is favorably settled out of court. Susman Godfrey is considered the top litigation boutique in the country. Max Tribble, lead counsel of Susman Godfrey, is the lead counsel for Worlds. Tribble has an extensive track record of patent infringement lawsuit wins and settlements for plaintiffs in lawsuits against large corporations, including:

Paltalk v. Microsoft

Mass Engineered Design v. Ergotron & Dell, et al

Sky Technologies v. Oracle

Sky Technologies v. IBM

November 30, 2016
 

The Unites States Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a ruling in Bungie, Inc (Developer Partner of Activision Blizzard) v. Worlds, Inc. validating certain key patent claims governing multiplayer interaction. 12 Claims were validated over 3 Patents.

IPR PTAB Validation on Worlds Patent 8145998 Claims 2,3,7,8, 11-18
https://www.scribd.com/document/356626284/IPR-8145998-7493558-718690-Worlds-Inc

IPR PTAB Validation on Worlds Patent 7493558 Claims 5, 7 
https://www.scribd.com/document/356626282/IPR-7181690-Worlds-2-of-3

IPR PTAB Validation on Worlds Patent 7181690 Claims 4, 8, 13, 16 
https://www.scribd.com/document/356626285/IPR-7493558-Worlds-3-of-3

December 5th 2016:

Worlds (WDDD) as well owns  9.3%  of Marimed (Nasdaq; MRMD) as of the  12/31/16 financial statement


December 6th 2016

Worlds Inc. (OTC QB:WDDD) is a leading intellectual property developer and licensee of patents related to 3D online virtual worlds. The Company has a portfolio of 9 US patents (6,219,045; 7,181,690; 7,493,558; 7,945,856; 8,082,501; 8,145,998; 8,161,385 8,407,592& 8,640,028) for multi-server technology in 3D applications, notably Virtual Worlds. The earliest of these patents issued on an application filed November 12, 1996. A provisional patent application, serial number 60/020,296, was filed on November 13, 1995.

These patents are related to each other and disclose and claim systems and methods for enabling users to interact in a virtual space. Worlds Inc. filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Activision Blizzard, Inc., Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and Activision Publishing, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on March 30, 2012.

Activision's World of Warcraft and Call of Duty video games have been identified in the complaint as infringing on Worlds' patents. Max L Tribble, lead counsel of Susman Godfrey L.L.P, will be lead counsel for Worlds in the suit.

The Markman hearing for the patent infringement suit by Worlds Inc. against Activision Blizzard, Inc., Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and Activision Publishing, Inc. (Activision Blizzard et al) (Nasdaq: ATVI), was held October 3, 2014 to address various aspects of the infringement suit claims and how the words in the 11 disputed 'constructions' in the claims should be construed for jury consideration. On June 26, 2015 Judge Denise Casper of the United District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled in favor of certain Worlds key definitions and interpretations governing the construction claims. Activision Blizzard the defendant in this action became “time-barred” to file an action to challenge the Patents using the only “other” venue that has the authority to disqualify the patents, The United States Patent Trial and Appeal Board.


December 6th 2016: 
                                                                                                          
Worlds current Federal Trial is on mutual consent hold pending the disposition of the validation or denial action of the PTAB. The Company's principle goal will be to continue to grow its IP portfolio, while protecting and monetizing it through patent infringement litigation. In addition, Worlds Inc. intends to be active in the creation and acquisition of related digital media technologies and patents that complement their current patent portfolio and that broaden the features, versatility and reach of the technology to allow for its utilization in the broadest possible way.

December 20th 2016

Worlds to Appeal to Federal Circuit on PTAB Rulings, Claims Marketwire   "Press Releases"
BOSTON, MA -- (Marketwired) -- 12/20/16 -- Worlds Inc. (OTCQB: WDDD) intends to file an appeal of recent Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) rulings to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding Worlds' seminal technology that has been fundamental to the development of massively multiplayer online role-playing gaming (MMORPG) into a $20-billion dollar industry. Worlds' current investors plan to exercise their warrants to fund the appeals and ongoing business operations.

August 25, 2017
Appellate Case #17-1481 

Bungie, Inc. files a reply to the Unites States Court Of Appeals arguing that Worlds IPR case should be upheld from the previous PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) Order. The PTAB is an Executive Branch Agency empowered by Congress under the American Invents Act- Currently under scrutiny by the Supreme Court under
Oil States Energy Services LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC  Case 16-712 ). The filing  for Bungie is open as of 8/29/2017 included below:
https://www.scribd.com/document/357529344/Bungies-Reply-Brief-Worlds-17-1481-Appeal-CAFC

**UPDATED** Worlds Reply Brief to Bungies Reply of the above 9/22/2017

https://www.scribd.com/document/359991704/Worlds-Reply-Bungie-v-Worlds-Appellate-for-PTAB

***UPDATED** 10/23/2017  Worlds case is partially dependent on the Wi-Fi One En Banc Appellate decision due out anytime. Worlds alleges that Bungie is acting in concert (privity)with Activision Blizzard ( a time barred Plaintiff for IPR purposes). Today there is no precedent to allow the PTAB Director or Board to be challenged with Judicial Review from the Courts. Wi-Fi one asks the courts to reverse Achaides and allow "judicial review"

"Should this court overrule Achates Reference Publishing, Inc. v. Apple Inc., 803 F.3d 652 (Fed. Cir. 2015) and hold that judicial review is available for a patent owner to challenge the PTO’s determination that the petitioner satisfied the timeliness requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) governing the filing of petitions for inter partes review?"

http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/content/wi-fi-one-llc-v-broadcom-corporation-rehearing-en-banc-order
.
 
 
 
SureTrader
Interactive Brokers Advertisement
WDDD
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
PostSubject
#26349  Sticky Note Max Tribble Worlds Attorney won vs. Microsoft. PatentPlays 08/23/17 09:57:37 AM
#25197  Sticky Note Nice Wddd article written from months ago for tryz 06/08/17 06:26:38 PM
#28795   Right now, it was just a matter of madprophet 12/11/17 10:52:41 PM
#28794   Madprophet How do they set the calendar day ? Patience to success 12/11/17 10:27:08 PM
#28793   WDDD accumulation. See chart link: http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=WDDD&p=D&b= IveBeenBagged 12/11/17 10:16:39 PM
#28792   Yeah but big sells too. madprophet 12/11/17 09:08:07 PM
#28791   Getting some big buys come through today. 88888 12/11/17 01:42:03 PM
#28790   anybody got a law 360 subscription? madprophet 12/08/17 01:39:46 AM
#28789   washinton Post piece about Gorsuch being the biggest madprophet 12/08/17 01:34:04 AM
#28788   Dyk isn't really bad though, he isn't good. madprophet 12/06/17 09:55:13 PM
#28787   Great find! I need to cross reference KidTraderDontHate 12/06/17 05:23:41 PM
#28785   Anybody have a law360 account? Its free, but madprophet 12/06/17 01:24:58 PM
#28783   I'm still waiting - want to give any MScott1 12/06/17 11:11:19 AM
#28781   LOL. Hope the door doesn't hit him in the... tradetrak 12/05/17 11:33:11 PM
#28780   With you there, Capt. tradetrak 12/05/17 11:28:55 PM
#28779   100% agree, without you, this board is so Luckyus 12/05/17 05:39:34 PM
#28778   Lol! I know that. It's all good. I'll White Coal 12/05/17 05:23:35 PM
#28777   Hip hip hooray! Tally Ho! Bye bye! Not Captart7 12/05/17 04:33:43 PM
#28776   Dude! Why you leaving? that's all that happens AlphaInvestor8 12/05/17 04:24:10 PM
#28775   Oh I get it. madprophet 12/05/17 11:08:48 AM
#28774   Apparently much more difficult than understanding why you're MScott1 12/05/17 08:53:48 AM
#28773   Thats the whole idea isn't it? Slow roll PatentPlays 12/05/17 08:26:49 AM
#28772   Goodbye to the board. White Coal 12/05/17 12:35:20 AM
#28771   Apparently much more difficult than understanding why you're White Coal 12/04/17 07:16:56 PM
#28770   You are quoting a press release from a MScott1 12/04/17 06:39:20 PM
#28769   This info is on the home page of White Coal 12/04/17 04:20:10 PM
#28768   This sure looks like a deliberate misstatement of Captart7 12/04/17 03:27:33 PM
#28767   I don't see any new large long positions madprophet 12/04/17 02:29:26 PM
#28766   Good points. As usual. White Coal 12/04/17 02:21:03 PM
#28765   People see what they want to see, usually. madprophet 12/04/17 02:07:01 PM
#28764   Worlds "current investment plan" December 20, 2016 White Coal 12/04/17 01:58:54 PM
#28763   Perhaps you didn’t read the 10Q or DataStream 12/04/17 01:47:44 PM
#28762   Thank you. It's appearing that way.. White Coal 12/04/17 01:18:58 PM
#28761   I feel you.I believe your position is valid madprophet 12/01/17 07:52:14 PM
#28760   I disagree. White Coal 12/01/17 02:42:46 PM
#28759   That sounds extremely reasonable. madprophet 12/01/17 01:55:45 PM
#28758   I dont think 0.01s will come...If the company AlphaInvestor8 12/01/17 01:44:28 PM
#28757   Accumulation increased for the month of November for IveBeenBagged 12/01/17 12:36:04 PM
#28756   A complete wrap up of Oil States with madprophet 12/01/17 10:52:59 AM
#28755   Another analysis of the Oil States orals. madprophet 12/01/17 10:48:42 AM
#28754   No worries, I won't average down, I will madprophet 11/30/17 08:23:04 PM
#28753   You are correct on it is a form madprophet 11/30/17 08:12:16 PM
#28752   Understood. However I am not referencing your personal position.. White Coal 11/30/17 08:08:37 PM
#28751   Patent friendly remarks from USPTO Director Nominee Andrei IveBeenBagged 11/30/17 08:00:09 PM
#28750   I guess when I refer to tanking I madprophet 11/30/17 07:58:30 PM
#28749   I appreciate your informative responses. White Coal 11/30/17 07:58:22 PM
#28748   It is possible, madprophet 11/30/17 07:53:17 PM
#28747   It all depends on where your perspective is madprophet 11/30/17 07:41:20 PM
#28746   Lol! And I thought our conversations were past us.. White Coal 11/30/17 05:36:13 PM
#28745   Also, Management has plans to further dilute as MScott1 11/30/17 05:27:33 PM
#28744   Risks?? How dare you suggest such a thing! White Coal 11/30/17 03:42:39 PM
#28743   Sucks. tradetrak 11/30/17 02:14:26 PM
PostSubject