Fidelity SPDR Advertisement
Home > Boards > US OTC > Computers - Software >

Worlds Inc (WDDD)

WDDD RSS Feed
Add WDDD Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: No Moderator rolvram, Lowhndcpr, iankelly
Search This Board:
Last Post: 11/23/2014 10:31:53 PM - Followers: 201 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0

Worlds Inc

History

Founded in 1994, Worlds Inc. invented and patented technology to solve problems associated with large-scale 3D multi-user environments, known as virtual worlds.

Worlds secured an early priority date by filing a provisional application with the USPTO in Nov, 1995. Within a year, Worlds filed a non-provisional patent application, claiming the priority date of their 1995 provisional application.

Worlds has pursued additional claims associated with their invention through a series of continuing patent applications, amassing a substantial patent portfolio:

Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
Nov 13, 1995 app 60/020,296 provisional
Nov 12, 1996 6,219,045 Apr 17, 2001
Aug 3, 2000 7,181,690 Feb 20, 2007
Nov 2, 2006 7,493,558 Feb 17, 2009
Jan 13, 2009 7,945,856 May 17, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,082,501 Dec 20, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,145,998 Mar 27, 2012
Apr 8, 2011 8,161,385 Apr 17, 2012
Apr 11, 2011 8,407,592 Mar 26, 2013
Jun 16, 2011 8,640,028 Jan 28, 2014


Their patent portfolio remains in force until Nov, 2016 (20 years from the filing date of their first non-provisional patent application).

Worlds v. Activision

Complaint

On Mar 30, 2012, Worlds filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Activision. Worlds’ lawsuit seeks monetary damages as well as a permanent injunction barring the manufacture and sale of infringing devices. Additionally, the complaint accuses Activision of willfully infringing and seeks an award of exemplary damages, attorneys' fees, and related court costs.

Representation

Susman Godfrey is representing Worlds, without fee, unless the lawsuit is successful or is favorably settled out of court. Susman Godfrey is considered the top litigation boutique in the country. Max Tribble, lead counsel of Susman Godfrey, is the lead counsel for Worlds. Tribble has an extensive track record of patent infringement lawsuit wins and settlements for plaintiffs in lawsuits against large corporations, including:

  • Paltalk v. Microsoft

  • Mass Engineered Design v. Ergotron & Dell, et al

  • Sky Technologies v. Oracle

  • Sky Technologies v. IBM

For the latest information, see below...


  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
WDDD
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
Wiki
WDDD News: Amended Annual Report (10-k/a) 07/02/2014 03:27:25 PM
WDDD News: Worlds Inc. vs. Activision Blizzard, Inc. Patent Infringement Markman Hearing Set for October 06/30/2014 08:00:00 AM
WDDD News: Activision Publishing Lawsuit Against Worlds Inc., Worlds Online Dismissed With Prejudice 06/02/2014 07:30:00 AM
PostSubject
#17669  Sticky Note Markman Hearing Went Well PatentPlays 10/05/14 04:56:01 PM
#17298  Sticky Note https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/15bENAu6Wg6ozd4CBfNYvfiQMjg6aaeJoWqI7vUjJ DataStream 09/08/14 07:06:23 AM
#17097  Sticky Note Markman Hearing :: 10/03/2014 iankelly 07/02/14 05:00:41 PM
#17874   Okay... But on what case. Is this re: tradetrak 11/23/14 10:31:52 PM
#17873   the court dealing with... dispute regarding expert reports sboy777 11/23/14 10:01:20 PM
#17872   I was thinking the samething. Don't know what Soulchef 11/22/14 11:49:50 PM
#17871   WTH? What is this? tradetrak 11/22/14 09:46:44 PM
#17870   things seem to be moving... forward.. at least sboy777 11/21/14 02:17:20 PM
#17869   has your opinion changed in any way? jomifa8301 11/21/14 08:55:17 AM
#17868   Upcoming Markman Decision PatentPlays 11/21/14 08:23:28 AM
#17867   agree op1 11/20/14 11:06:22 AM
#17866   The good news here is that Hudson believes Looking4BIGcash 11/20/14 09:49:24 AM
#17865   On or about September 9, 2014, Hudson Bay Lowhndcpr 11/20/14 09:22:04 AM
#17864   10-q out! wobblybob 11/20/14 08:42:38 AM
#17863   zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...for judge ......this was originally scheduled op1 11/17/14 01:29:20 PM
#17862   I love this....hudson or someone else heavy on jomifa8301 11/17/14 12:21:55 PM
#17861   Hudson Bay? WhiteOwl 11/13/14 01:16:35 PM
#17860   Not sure. Does anyone know if marksman hearing CDJ 11/13/14 01:03:51 PM
#17859   Thanks for the heads up. Just bought another Looking4BIGcash 11/13/14 12:06:01 PM
#17858   SOMEONE WANTING OUT OF 500K SHARES - 16.5 rolvram 11/13/14 10:47:33 AM
#17857   whatever your smoking send some my way......... op1 11/13/14 09:31:13 AM
#17856   EXPECT TO HEAR FROM HER AROUND MID FEBRUARY rolvram 11/13/14 09:02:27 AM
#17855   Just posting for continuity. Does anyone think WhiteOwl 11/12/14 06:48:02 PM
#17854   Could not have said it any better ................. op1 11/11/14 07:49:13 AM
#17853   horse to water? iankelly 11/10/14 08:21:42 AM
#17852   Well, in that case light me a Blunt Captart7 11/06/14 12:41:21 PM
#17851   Patent, I appreciate the comment. Just mind boggling JC4033 11/06/14 10:54:57 AM
#17850   That would be a most welcome occurance, WhiteOwl. tradetrak 11/05/14 04:50:09 PM
#17849   Activision had an earnings conference call and no WhiteOwl 11/05/14 02:03:46 PM
#17848   fyi 50k wddd sold for tax loss....no doubt op1 11/05/14 10:22:58 AM
#17847   THAT OLD LAW FROM 1982 (CODE 280E) IS rolvram 11/04/14 07:24:31 PM
#17846   MariMed receives consulting fees from its clients to DataStream 11/04/14 07:22:19 PM
#17845   Be aware that the Feds (IRS) are taxing Captart7 11/04/14 05:18:20 PM
#17844   WDDD owns 18% of WORX - MariMed is DataStream 11/04/14 01:16:31 PM
#17843   I said the same thing last year about WhiteOwl 11/03/14 11:34:52 PM
#17842   wddd is a very frustrating speculative investment......company clearly op1 11/03/14 05:02:49 PM
#17841   zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz the us court system doesn't care a op1 11/03/14 04:54:04 PM
#17840   Geez. This is worse than watching paint dry. tradetrak 11/03/14 03:05:18 PM
#17839   Right you are. tradetrak 10/29/14 10:43:08 PM
#17838   Only 237 patents were subject to that review. PatentPlays 10/29/14 07:03:11 PM
#17837   You make a Point PatentPlays 10/29/14 06:50:15 PM
#17836   Extremely light volume. PatentPlays 10/29/14 06:39:41 PM
#17835   One of the most interesting paragraphs... tradetrak 10/29/14 11:06:04 AM
#17834   Interesting Read: Patent Suits Drop as Rule Changes Looking4BIGcash 10/29/14 10:40:52 AM
#17833   a little life..that is good to see. jomifa8301 10/27/14 11:06:51 AM
#17832   Thx for that. I've never been one Rhodey 10/25/14 12:48:42 PM
#17831   I try to look at this logically. For WhiteOwl 10/24/14 05:58:14 PM
#17830   Sorry Keith but I feel I must disagree: http://otcshortreport.com/index.php?inde Looking4BIGcash 10/24/14 04:12:27 PM
#17829   I do not know any credible people on keith richards 10/24/14 01:28:20 PM
#17828   I meant how much did WDDD receive, Hudson redrabbit 10/24/14 12:35:41 PM
#17827   What was their initial investment? How much redrabbit 10/24/14 12:33:44 PM
#17826   I'd hope for more but I'm thinking even Captart7 10/24/14 11:44:01 AM
#17825   Let us not forget. iankelly 10/24/14 11:00:16 AM
PostSubject