Vector VestAdvertisement SPDR Advertisement
Home > Boards > US OTC > Computers - Software >

Worlds Inc (WDDD)

WDDD RSS Feed
Add WDDD Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: No Moderator rolvram, Lowhndcpr
Search This Board:
Last Post: 1/29/2015 11:34:31 PM - Followers: 200 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0

Worlds Inc

History

Founded in 1994, Worlds Inc. invented and patented technology to solve problems associated with large-scale 3D multi-user environments, known as virtual worlds.

Worlds secured an early priority date by filing a provisional application with the USPTO in Nov, 1995. Within a year, Worlds filed a non-provisional patent application, claiming the priority date of their 1995 provisional application.

Worlds has pursued additional claims associated with their invention through a series of continuing patent applications, amassing a substantial patent portfolio:

Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
Nov 13, 1995 app 60/020,296 provisional
Nov 12, 1996 6,219,045 Apr 17, 2001
Aug 3, 2000 7,181,690 Feb 20, 2007
Nov 2, 2006 7,493,558 Feb 17, 2009
Jan 13, 2009 7,945,856 May 17, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,082,501 Dec 20, 2011
Mar 19, 2009 8,145,998 Mar 27, 2012
Apr 8, 2011 8,161,385 Apr 17, 2012
Apr 11, 2011 8,407,592 Mar 26, 2013
Jun 16, 2011 8,640,028 Jan 28, 2014


Their patent portfolio remains in force until Nov, 2016 (20 years from the filing date of their first non-provisional patent application).

Worlds v. Activision

Complaint

On Mar 30, 2012, Worlds filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Activision. Worlds’ lawsuit seeks monetary damages as well as a permanent injunction barring the manufacture and sale of infringing devices. Additionally, the complaint accuses Activision of willfully infringing and seeks an award of exemplary damages, attorneys' fees, and related court costs.

Representation

Susman Godfrey is representing Worlds, without fee, unless the lawsuit is successful or is favorably settled out of court. Susman Godfrey is considered the top litigation boutique in the country. Max Tribble, lead counsel of Susman Godfrey, is the lead counsel for Worlds. Tribble has an extensive track record of patent infringement lawsuit wins and settlements for plaintiffs in lawsuits against large corporations, including:

  • Paltalk v. Microsoft

  • Mass Engineered Design v. Ergotron & Dell, et al

  • Sky Technologies v. Oracle

  • Sky Technologies v. IBM

For the latest information, see below...


  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
WDDD
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
Wiki
PostSubject
#17298  Sticky Note https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/15bENAu6Wg6ozd4CBfNYvfiQMjg6aaeJoWqI7vUjJ DataStream 09/08/14 07:06:23 AM
#17097  Sticky Note Markman Hearing :: 10/03/2014 iankelly 07/02/14 05:00:41 PM
#18044   Coming up on 4 months on February 3rd. WhiteOwl 01/29/15 11:34:31 PM
#18043   Judge timeline LouisDesyjr 01/28/15 02:37:53 PM
#18042   bid/ask spread has tightened, maybe another step up...over jomifa8301 01/28/15 10:27:25 AM
#18041   Lol littleg 01/28/15 10:04:33 AM
#18040   Look at the snow days that Casper has WhiteOwl 01/28/15 09:59:01 AM
#18039   Why 130 days? tradetrak 01/27/15 10:35:07 PM
#18038   Believe it could be 130 days ........ Good op1 01/27/15 08:34:51 PM
#18037   how exciting would it be to see $WDDD jomifa8301 01/27/15 04:30:46 PM
#18036   "Requirements? Requirements!?!?! Federal judges don't need no stinkin' require Noreika 01/27/15 01:12:01 PM
#18035   Required?? Is the judge required to rule littleg 01/27/15 10:07:21 AM
#18034   No 'new strike price' LouisDesyjr 01/26/15 06:21:39 PM
#18033   Thanks! What is Hudson's new strike price? CDJ 01/26/15 12:57:39 PM
#18032   Now that Hudson has been resolved... watch for Looking4BIGcash 01/26/15 11:18:45 AM
#18031   Personally, I think Hudson Bay sees a positive WhiteOwl 01/25/15 06:35:43 PM
#18030   What happened to the short squeeze you spoke BondsSF 01/24/15 11:21:17 PM
#18029   Hmmm. I hadn't either but I'm actually surprised tradetrak 01/24/15 04:44:22 PM
#18028   http://www.worlds.com/patentinformation.html I'm embarrassed to say that I hav Lowhndcpr 01/24/15 07:43:28 AM
#18027   Datastream, what's your take on the Hudson Bay settlement? Go_War_Eagle 01/23/15 09:30:11 PM
#18026   I guess but I really hate to see tradetrak 01/23/15 09:07:58 PM
#18025   Hudson Bay case settled LouisDesyjr 01/23/15 06:01:33 PM
#18024   True true... maybe I should ask the littleg 01/23/15 02:16:40 PM
#18023   Better to ask a Fortune teller then a lawyer. Captart7 01/23/15 02:11:22 PM
#18022   Yes, Louis. It's really far better than a tradetrak 01/23/15 01:58:11 PM
#18021   Well that clears it up lol littleg 01/23/15 11:57:10 AM
#18020   Will do littleg 01/23/15 11:56:46 AM
#18019   Please research Data Stream's posts. You will DonePavin 01/23/15 11:13:45 AM
#18018   Up garyhalvo 01/23/15 11:04:53 AM
#18017   My respect to all if the legal minds littleg 01/23/15 10:57:37 AM
#18016   Decision releases LouisDesyjr 01/23/15 09:03:40 AM
#18015   Markman Ruling probably in late Feb early March gibson256 01/22/15 10:54:41 AM
#18014   FYI .............judge has a history of releasing decisions op1 01/22/15 07:54:08 AM
#18013   volume not significant...imo nothing imminent...there is always "the jomifa8301 01/21/15 01:33:17 PM
#18012   Volume up. PPS up. TEVA decision considered positive retjarhead 01/21/15 12:37:22 PM
#18011   Agreed gibson256. The restoration of the "clearly erroneous" tradetrak 01/20/15 10:51:41 PM
#18010   Worlds Markman carries more importance Post-TEVA v. Sandoz ruling PatentPlays 01/20/15 08:48:25 PM
#18009   I have only read the first few pages gibson256 01/20/15 06:21:36 PM
#18008   Oh yeah! I'd actually rather Casper didn't issue tradetrak 01/20/15 04:19:10 PM
#18007   Patent stocks rally after Supreme Court's Teva ruling ariadndndough 01/20/15 02:27:22 PM
#18006   The decision in TEVA is powerful and points rolvram 01/20/15 12:37:34 PM
#18005   i'm going to continue adding to my position. jomifa8301 01/20/15 11:28:49 AM
#18004   Looks like today might be the start of buylosellhi 01/20/15 09:41:16 AM
#18003   .18 in premarket with volume hummm????????? ariadndndough 01/20/15 09:29:50 AM
#18002   Please give buyout talk a rest, no way. crtdude 01/19/15 10:13:19 PM
#18001   Louis, Makes sense to me. Does anyone WhiteOwl 01/19/15 09:53:02 PM
#18000   You clearly are in the dark on the DataStream 01/19/15 06:29:01 PM
#17999   Because they knew they would win outright and expediter13 01/19/15 04:51:17 PM
#17998   ATVI would not make a play for WDDD Looking4BIGcash 01/19/15 04:26:55 PM
#17997   Legal ramifications ATVI buying WDDD LouisDesyjr 01/19/15 10:02:07 AM
#17996   I am still baffled as to why ATVI art35 01/18/15 01:25:35 PM
#17995   WDDD vs ATVI award amounts LouisDesyjr 01/18/15 12:12:00 PM
PostSubject