Vector VestAdvertisement Vector VestAdvertisement SPDR Advertisement
Home > Boards > US OTC > Miscellaneous >

Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (SPNGQ)

SPNGQ RSS Feed
Add SPNGQ Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: No Moderator scion, flaflyersfan, Renee
Search This Board:
Last Post: 1/23/2015 2:20:54 PM - Followers: 730 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0
                


Licensing Established For Products:
 

July 1st 2009 - Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. Expands Nickelodeon and Viacom Licensing Agreement in Canada

November 14th 2009 - SpongeTech Delivery Systems, Inc. entered into a license agreement with Marvel Characters B.V.

 

SEC Enforcement Litigation Releases: 

May 5th 2010 - Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 3131 / May 5, 2010


Up-To-Date Media and Blog News:

January 15th 2012 - SEC adds Metter's Greenwich Radio Station as Defendant in Spongetech Fraud Suit (Teri Buhl - Blog)
May 23rd 2012 -        Big glitch in feds' case against Spongetech - (Aaron Elstein - Crains)
August 7th 2012 -     Bankrupt Spongetech Racked Up $9.5M In Unpaid Sports Sponsorship, Advertising Bills (David Broughton, sportsBusiness Journal)


Bankruptcy / Civil / Criminal Court Proceedings - Motion/Filings/Memorandum and Orders:

May 17th 2012 -      United States v. Metter - Criminal Case
May 25th 2012 -      SEC v. Spongetech - Civil Case - Doc 231 Letter Enclosing Settlement Documents for Moskowitz by SEC
May 25th 2012 -      SEC v. Spongetech - Doc 231-2 Consent of Steven Moskowitz
July 11th 2012 -      USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 242 First Motion for Ext. of Time to File the Gov's Resp. to Def's July 6th 2012 Motion for Discl. by USA to Metter
July 16th 2012 -      USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 243 Motion to Suppress (Newly Disclosed Subpoenaed Spongetech Backup Hard Drive) by Michael Metter
July 31st 2012 -      USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 252 - Gov's Sealed Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants Motion for Discovery
August 6th 2012 -   SEC v. Spongetech - Civil Case - Doc 236 Order Granting 237 Motion for Extension of Time to File
August 13th 2012 - USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 255 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response by USA as to Michael Metter
August 17th 2012 - USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 256 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response as to 255, filed by Metter
August 17th 2012 - USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 257 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 243 Motion to Suppress Newly Disclosed Subpoenaed Spongetech Backup Hard Drive (Reilly, Nathan)

Bankruptcy Court Proceedings Regarding SpongeTech's Assets Dicon  / BTR

June 25th 2012 - Dicon Doc 366 Chapter 11 Ballot Filed by Christine Brenner (Rejects)
June 26th 2012 - Dicon Doc 371 Chapter 11 Ballot Filed by Leland J. Markle (Rejects)
July 26th 2012SEC v. Spongetech - Doc 238 Letter Regarding Appointment of Receiver over BTR by SEC


Bankruptcy Proceedings - Shareholder Estate Rep Motion/Filings:


Bankruptcy Proceedings - Shareholder Letter/EMails to Honorable Judge Bernstein:

July 11th 2012 -      Filed by Jay P. Booth, "Spongetech Doc 389 Letter Re EMail
July 16th 2012 -      Filed by A. Venkatesh, "Spongetech Doc 390-7 SEC Complaint
July 16th 2012 -      Filed by A. Venkatesh "Doc 390-4 SPNG Master Transaction Journal 7-22 "
July 16th 2012 -      Filed by A. Venkatesh "Doc 390-6 Economic Warfare Risks and Responses by Kevin D. Freeman"
July 16th 2012 -      Filed by A. Venkatesh "Doc 390-7 SEC Complaint"
July 31st 2012 -      Filed by Jay P. Booth, "Spongetech Doc 392 Letter Email
August 2nd 2012Filed by Julia Shumko, "Spongetech Doc 393 Letter Email
August 2nd 2012Filed by Jay P. Booth, "Spongetech Doc 394 Letter Email DOJ Protective Order
August 14th 2012 - Filed by A. Venkatesh "Doc 395 Letter Re: "Emerald Asset Advisors LLC"

BK Trustee's Status Conference Transcripts: * next status conference scheduled for Sept. 25th 2012

June 26th 2012 - Chapter 7 Status Conference

* SpongeTech Trustee' Website *


Class Action Lawsuit Information:

May 1st 2012 - Spongetech Class Action Doc 69 Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint Jury Trial Demanded

  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
SPNGQ
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
Wiki
PostSubject
#344464  Sticky Note 08/01/2014 379 RESPONSE in Opposition re 377 MOTION scion 08/08/14 08:32:04 AM
#343242  Sticky Note Spongetech: The SEC charges filed March 30, 2012: Renee 03/02/14 09:17:29 AM
#345127   Can't be too careful. janice shell 01/23/15 02:20:54 PM
#345126   Pacer update 22 Jan 15 - USA v. scion 01/23/15 11:37:25 AM
#345125   OK, see it. just waiting for the right flrda444 01/23/15 11:35:06 AM
#345124   Click on the "Positions" tab. The shares cowtown jay 01/23/15 11:28:49 AM
#345123   01/21/2015 337 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 335 Objection scion 01/23/15 11:15:42 AM
#345122   Pacer update 21 Jan 15 - SEC v scion 01/23/15 11:12:44 AM
#345121   TDA has O'ed out spngq on my acc-. flrda444 01/23/15 09:45:46 AM
#345120   So, you're saying that after concealing their trail kegparty 01/23/15 09:07:15 AM
#345119   With all this evidence of fraud why can't madeindet 01/23/15 07:37:29 AM
#345118   If Canaccord had done their job, and blocked cowtown jay 01/23/15 12:16:04 AM
#345117   "Imagine if Cannacord did their job and turned shajandr 01/22/15 11:51:25 PM
#345116   $15,000,000 worth of reasons for the SEC to madeindet 01/22/15 03:20:56 PM
#345115   So BOTH the most well-represented defendant, AND the cowtown jay 01/22/15 11:57:19 AM
#345114   The document does not elaborate beyond the initials scion 01/21/15 07:10:46 PM
#345113   Scion who was EE and UA???? madeindet 01/21/15 07:06:39 PM
#345112   Pacer update 15 Jan 15 - SEC v scion 01/21/15 11:48:17 AM
#345111   To evade taxes. janice shell 01/20/15 12:28:49 AM
#345110   Why did the UNNAMED "Europeans" need a madeindet 01/19/15 06:50:54 PM
#345109   My question... Why should the people that are Litchfield 01/19/15 06:43:19 PM
#345108   this is getting more interesting by the day 236T568 01/19/15 01:31:11 PM
#345107   20. On eight days, between April and September, scion 01/19/15 01:04:21 PM
#345106   THE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING is to determine scion 01/19/15 01:02:19 PM
#345105   Of course its over for the share holders puppydotcom 01/19/15 12:28:15 PM
#345104   Why didn't the IIROC pick it up puppydotcom 01/19/15 12:23:58 PM
#345103   it doesn't matter, the Spongetech name was sold alien42 01/19/15 11:19:40 AM
#345102   It does seem a bit curious that if alien42 01/19/15 11:17:57 AM
#345101   Under Armour Spongetech basketballs? Google it. Same Songetech? surfmore 01/19/15 11:16:34 AM
#345099   Where are you getting these intitials? cowtown jay 01/18/15 08:34:13 PM
#345098   But when the SEC doesn't perform "... their cowtown jay 01/18/15 08:32:15 PM
#345097   SPNG violated the SEC rules ( and many puppydotcom 01/18/15 01:26:01 PM
#345096   RK DP there someone who accumulated 190 million shares madeindet 01/18/15 08:35:26 AM
#345095   The degree to which the SEC and the cowtown jay 01/17/15 08:43:55 PM
#345093   The SEC and the DOJ had zero to puppydotcom 01/17/15 03:45:44 PM
#345091   When I read this document and the way starfire 01/17/15 01:17:51 PM
#345090   Star fire is he guilty yes. Why was madeindet 01/17/15 01:03:16 PM
#345089   The issue is not whether Steer is guilty starfire 01/17/15 12:52:42 PM
#345088   As far as I'm concerned, Steer is a puppydotcom 01/17/15 11:26:59 AM
#345087   "improperly issued tens of millions unregistered shares. None madeindet 01/16/15 11:40:22 PM
#345086   99.9 % of this con artist scam stuff puppydotcom 01/16/15 04:41:27 PM
#345085   yes, nothing new 236T568 01/16/15 03:20:23 PM
#345084   With these two deposits, the Respondent puppydotcom 01/16/15 03:10:50 PM
#345083   The Notice of Hearing which sets out the scion 01/16/15 02:03:18 PM
#345082   Who was the "individual"? 236T568 01/16/15 01:58:40 PM
#345081   Enforcement Notice - IN THE MATTER OF Douglas scion 01/16/15 12:53:25 PM
#345080   IIROC files case against Steer for Spongetech trading scion 01/16/15 12:51:42 PM
#345079   Is spongebob in Walgreen's yet? edgeice8 01/14/15 08:35:47 PM
#345078   When I say "only," I'm not referring to cowtown jay 01/10/15 02:23:45 PM
#345077   The SEC disagrees with you: http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20110411/BLOGS0 shajandr 01/10/15 11:24:22 AM
#345076   lmao@u. You didn't get my sarcasm? duh....There is kegparty 01/10/15 09:50:25 AM
#345075   "Why should I have placed myself, only, on shajandr 01/10/15 02:29:04 AM
PostSubject