SureTrader Advertisement PRTC
Home > Boards > US OTC > Delisted >

Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. (fka SPNGQ)

RSS Feed
Add Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: shajandr
Search This Board:
Last Post: 5/20/2016 2:49:03 AM - Followers: 729 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0
                


Licensing Established For Products:
 

July 1st 2009 - Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. Expands Nickelodeon and Viacom Licensing Agreement in Canada

November 14th 2009 - SpongeTech Delivery Systems, Inc. entered into a license agreement with Marvel Characters B.V.

 

SEC Enforcement Litigation Releases: 

May 5th 2010 - Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 3131 / May 5, 2010


Up-To-Date Media and Blog News:

January 15th 2012 - SEC adds Metter's Greenwich Radio Station as Defendant in Spongetech Fraud Suit (Teri Buhl - Blog)
May 23rd 2012 -        Big glitch in feds' case against Spongetech - (Aaron Elstein - Crains)
August 7th 2012 -     Bankrupt Spongetech Racked Up $9.5M In Unpaid Sports Sponsorship, Advertising Bills (David Broughton, sportsBusiness Journal)


Bankruptcy / Civil / Criminal Court Proceedings - Motion/Filings/Memorandum and Orders:

May 17th 2012 -      United States v. Metter - Criminal Case
May 25th 2012 -      SEC v. Spongetech - Civil Case - Doc 231 Letter Enclosing Settlement Documents for Moskowitz by SEC
May 25th 2012 -      SEC v. Spongetech - Doc 231-2 Consent of Steven Moskowitz
July 11th 2012 -      USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 242 First Motion for Ext. of Time to File the Gov's Resp. to Def's July 6th 2012 Motion for Discl. by USA to Metter
July 16th 2012 -      USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 243 Motion to Suppress (Newly Disclosed Subpoenaed Spongetech Backup Hard Drive) by Michael Metter
July 31st 2012 -      USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 252 - Gov's Sealed Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants Motion for Discovery
August 6th 2012 -   SEC v. Spongetech - Civil Case - Doc 236 Order Granting 237 Motion for Extension of Time to File
August 13th 2012 - USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 255 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response by USA as to Michael Metter
August 17th 2012 - USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 256 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response as to 255, filed by Metter
August 17th 2012 - USA v. Metter - Criminal Case - Doc 257 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 243 Motion to Suppress Newly Disclosed Subpoenaed Spongetech Backup Hard Drive (Reilly, Nathan)

Bankruptcy Court Proceedings Regarding SpongeTech's Assets Dicon  / BTR

June 25th 2012 - Dicon Doc 366 Chapter 11 Ballot Filed by Christine Brenner (Rejects)
June 26th 2012 - Dicon Doc 371 Chapter 11 Ballot Filed by Leland J. Markle (Rejects)
July 26th 2012SEC v. Spongetech - Doc 238 Letter Regarding Appointment of Receiver over BTR by SEC


Bankruptcy Proceedings - Shareholder Estate Rep Motion/Filings:


Bankruptcy Proceedings - Shareholder Letter/EMails to Honorable Judge Bernstein:

July 11th 2012 -      Filed by Jay P. Booth, "Spongetech Doc 389 Letter Re EMail
July 16th 2012 -      Filed by A. Venkatesh, "Spongetech Doc 390-7 SEC Complaint
July 16th 2012 -      Filed by A. Venkatesh "Doc 390-4 SPNG Master Transaction Journal 7-22 "
July 16th 2012 -      Filed by A. Venkatesh "Doc 390-6 Economic Warfare Risks and Responses by Kevin D. Freeman"
July 16th 2012 -      Filed by A. Venkatesh "Doc 390-7 SEC Complaint"
July 31st 2012 -      Filed by Jay P. Booth, "Spongetech Doc 392 Letter Email
August 2nd 2012Filed by Julia Shumko, "Spongetech Doc 393 Letter Email
August 2nd 2012Filed by Jay P. Booth, "Spongetech Doc 394 Letter Email DOJ Protective Order
August 14th 2012 - Filed by A. Venkatesh "Doc 395 Letter Re: "Emerald Asset Advisors LLC"

BK Trustee's Status Conference Transcripts: * next status conference scheduled for Sept. 25th 2012

June 26th 2012 - Chapter 7 Status Conference

* SpongeTech Trustee' Website *


Class Action Lawsuit Information:

May 1st 2012 - Spongetech Class Action Doc 69 Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint Jury Trial Demanded

PostSubject
#346145   So properly it would go something like? Teflon2Insults 05/18/16 10:06:37 AM
#346144   "Whom" is used when it's an object (after shajandr 05/17/16 10:50:05 PM
#346141   "File suit against who [sic]? cowtown jay 05/17/16 11:59:50 AM
#346139   SPNGQ shares deemed worthless. EOM flaflyersfan 05/17/16 11:51:10 AM
#346138   Whoever you think are the unicorns that 'cheated shajandr 05/17/16 02:17:53 AM
#346137   Dude, it's OVER. There is no Spongtech anymore. shajandr 05/16/16 01:53:12 PM
#346133   Welp, that's pure bullshet - Texas or otherwise shajandr 05/15/16 11:51:47 PM
#346132   Huh??? What company? What biz? Teflon2Insults 05/15/16 09:50:09 PM
#346131   Give it a Texas minute, partner. cowtown jay 05/15/16 05:53:12 AM
#346130   yep, it has been real fun, hasn't it? 236T568 05/14/16 03:08:48 PM
#346127   LOL. I bought the car-wash sponge yrs ago...and wiredawg 05/10/16 01:12:42 PM
#346121   SOMEONE IS TRYING TO MAKE BACK SOME SPONGETECH LOSSES.....LOL [SMART MONEY] 05/05/16 09:36:05 PM
#346120   True, let it go folks.. greenlife 05/02/16 12:14:33 AM
#346119   This might hepp us understand a bit more shajandr 05/01/16 05:06:48 PM
#346115   I imagine this is a silly question, but janice shell 04/15/16 05:00:54 PM
#346114  Restored Did I mention my involvement in pumping SpongeTech, cowtown jay 04/15/16 12:12:48 PM
#346113   So..... did you state in your court documents that 236T568 04/14/16 03:04:51 PM
#346112   Didn't the CMKX CEO flee after being criminally janice shell 04/14/16 02:16:18 PM
#346111   "Each. And. Every. Time..." that I put forth cowtown jay 04/14/16 02:06:52 PM
#346110   Didn't the CMKX CEO flee after being criminally 236T568 04/14/16 11:03:29 AM
#346109   And each and every time, the court has shajandr 04/14/16 09:26:30 AM
#346108  Restored "Mossack Fonseca was just one of a number cowtown jay 04/13/16 01:01:26 PM
#346106   "And trying to turn the Spongetech scam to Teflon2Insults 04/09/16 11:51:34 AM
#346105   It's hardly a point worth making. When cowtown jay 04/09/16 05:38:32 AM
#346104   Short squeeze? :-) Weird·o 04/08/16 11:45:48 PM
#346103   SPNG SCAM is OVER :-D Weird·o 04/08/16 11:41:45 PM
#346102   There was never 10's of thousands of "investors" Weird·o 04/08/16 11:39:46 PM
#346101   They handed out shares in football stadiums... Weird·o 04/08/16 11:38:16 PM
#346100   Yet, it is YOU that claimed that only 236T568 04/08/16 10:12:51 PM
#346099   I'll be more than happy to retract my cowtown jay 04/08/16 08:49:47 PM
#346098   I'd dispute that, but either way, it has janice shell 04/08/16 08:39:47 PM
#346097   The takeaway is that some of the decisions cowtown jay 04/08/16 08:38:28 PM
#346096   As you know, nobody bought directly from SpongeTech. cowtown jay 04/08/16 08:33:27 PM
#346095   Of course, just like all retail shareholders did. cowtown jay 04/08/16 08:31:54 PM
#346094   Sorry, I'm not getting it. janice shell 04/08/16 08:31:21 PM
#346093   "Lynch said she’s currently “evaluating discrimination complaints against cowtown jay 04/08/16 08:28:04 PM
#346092   yet many of the entities and individuals that 236T568 04/08/16 08:16:58 PM
#346091   Did you buy the stock in question on janice shell 04/08/16 08:16:35 PM
#346090   As I told you before, I did not cowtown jay 04/08/16 08:13:00 PM
#346089   Hopefully, she's in her last few months as janice shell 04/08/16 08:09:05 PM
#346088   huh? explain why you wouldn't be charged with selling 236T568 04/08/16 08:07:12 PM
#346087   "should YOU also be charged with selling unregistered shares?" cowtown jay 04/08/16 07:52:00 PM
#346086   But wait, you also have admitted to buying 236T568 04/08/16 05:04:34 PM
#346085   All of the stock was sold through RME, cowtown jay 04/08/16 04:51:05 PM
#346084   Yes, they no doubt filed the 8-A to janice shell 04/08/16 04:26:03 PM
#346083   These Amendments, going back to March 2007, were cowtown jay 04/08/16 04:22:44 PM
#346082   All of Spongetech's common stock as of 28 janice shell 04/08/16 03:19:21 PM
#346081   Obviously, the shares were resold by members of cowtown jay 04/08/16 03:15:48 PM
#346080   When you discuss this case with your students, janice shell 04/08/16 01:37:34 PM
#346077   Would be...and on how, in basically just going Teflon2Insults 04/08/16 12:01:38 PM
PostSubject