I GOT MONKED!!!

[ctrumabll]

Slap dat ask!

Slap dat ask!

Why isn't anybody slapping dat ask?

[Crazy Money]

Lock the float...

[Crazy Money]

KNOW WHAT YOU OWN! lol

[ctrumabll]

In the "people who forget history are condemned to repeat it" department:

I saw somebody pushing the "float lockdown" theory!

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=125166922

I felt like I had woken up in 2009 somehow.

[Crazy Money]

[Crazy Money]

Why? ... still waiting for the lawsuit

oh I see you believed HSA as well... lolzzz... he was another that threaten me... ooopzzz

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=95062185

stockchaser Tuesday, 12/17/13 04:50:43 PM
Re: HotStockAce post# 286316 Post # 286320 of 301063
And i reckon im coming back...

[stockchaser]

Its been 5 yrs....let it go...

[Crazy Money]

Monk said I did... he was full of B.S.

obviously...

[Crazy Money]

And if you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you...

[Crazy Money]

See how that works... Dazzle them with brilliance.. and baffle them with......

[Crazy Money]

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=54904330

[Crazy Money]

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/Profile.aspx?user=104497

[Crazy Money]

look back, I shorted CDIV .72 lol... no wait, that was MONK tellin' people to buy it cause they were "locking the float"... he even got the elderly to put life savings into his SCAMS... and they lost it all... where is MONK now?

[vantillian]

The truth comes out! Finally! Bless you!

[ctrumabll]

Wish I could have shorted the Monk scams.

[Crazy Money]

Sorry for "shorting" the MONK SCAMS

[Crazy Money]

Like That lolzzz

[Crazy Money]

I did NOT get MONKED weeeeeeee...

[ctrumabll]

Monkster was a fool. He should have fled to Belize in his Cirrus with duffel bags 0of cult-dupe cash in the back and Mel by his side.

[Crazy Money]

LOCK THE FLOAT weeeeeeeeeeeeee

[Crazy Money]

Jerry Williams was a a FOOL ... I told him not to mess with me... lol

[Crazy Money]

[ctrumabll]

Pretty sure Monkster threatened you mostly because the marks expected it from him.

[Crazy Money]

CDIV .72 ... lock the float.... yeah O.K. ... does not take a Rocket Scientist to figure that one out after running from .0007 ... oh wait... eat an Apple...

nobody looks here, but I remember back then MONK telling people to buy up there to make the shorts squeeze... with that total B.S. ... he went away to try to start a new site after that, it failed BIG TIME...

[Crazy Money]

He was one of the foolzzz that threatened the wrong people...

[ctrumabll]

Wow. If Monkster threatened to sue me, I would make that my sig line. The only time I got threatened with a lawsuit, it was the guy in charge of RDXM, who is a very small-timer compared to the Monkman.

[Crazy Money]

[Crazy Money]

FYI: Still waiting for MONK to sue me...

[Crazy Money]

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=78984427&txt2find=lock

[ctrumabll]

Don't see the "lock da float" T-shirts much these days.

[Crazy Money]

Lock the Float

[ctrumabll]

Maybe he's going to start giving seminars on how to negotiate with the SEC to avoid prison.

Lesson #1: "Stupid + crazy= leniency."

[JZS]

Maybe he's going to start giving seminars on how to negotiate with the SEC to avoid prison.

[JZS]

Maybe he's going to start giving seminars on how to negotiate with the SEC to avoid prison.

[ctrumabll]

Maybe Monkster is planning on pimping out the few remaining members of his cult.

[JZS]

Well...he's got (had) the 4.9 to pay off the SEC, so it came from somewhere. Maybe he traded, maybe involved in some other deal. Anyway, he could afford to buy his way out of a jam.

[Wildbilly]

Monk couldn't find and execute a decent trade

with four hands and a flashlight much less turn $2.4m into $4.9m in any amount of time.

One side sees there is no prospect to collect any money and is tired of spending it.

The other side has no money to continue. What the quid pro quo will be, I can only guess.

[JZS]

Monk's consent order of final judgment

Actually, he wont be paying for a long time. He writes 1 check (due 2-25-14) for 4.9 million and that's it, case closed. He agreed to it (consent), which means that he has the money. It's a great deal. 1.Steal 2.4 mil. 2.Trade it for a few years 3.Pay off the SEC 4.9 mil. 4. Keep the rest and live happily ever after. Why the hell would he run for the border with a deal like that? As long as people can buy their way out of prison by agreeing to civil penalties, then crime will continue to pay.

[Crazy Money]

weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

[ctrumabll]

Jer-Bear just had his consent Order entered. Looks like he will be paying for a long time.

He should have made a "run for the border" with Mel, the Cirrus, and a gym bag full of $100 bills when he had the chance.

[JZS]

Jerry S. Williams
3123 North 82nd Way
Mesa, Arizona 85207

insert-text-here

[ctrumabll]

So much for all those ENSSFM claims Bryant was throwing around.

Not unsurprisingly, the minnows (Kelly & Duncan) are going to be ruined, while the ringmaster (Bryant) will never be extradited.

[Stock]

ok

SEC Charges Company and its Two Principals and Attorney in Stock Manipulation Scheme

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 22495 / September 27, 2012

Securities and Exchange Commission v. 8000, Inc., Jonathan E. Bryant, Thomas J. Kelly, and Carl N. Duncan, Esq., Civil Action No. 12-CV-7261 (S.D.N.Y.)

SEC Charges Company and its Two Principals and Attorney in Stock Manipulation Scheme

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed an enforcement action on September 27, 2012, in federal court in New York charging 8000, Inc., Jonathan E. Bryant, Thomas J. Kelly, and Carl N. Duncan, Esq. for their roles in a scheme to manipulate 8000, Inc.'s stock price. The complaint charges the defendants misrepresented 8000, Inc.'s financial condition to investors while simultaneously selling, or facilitating the sale of, the company's securities in violation of the antifraud and securities registration provisions of the federal securities laws. According to the complaint, the defendants' scheme increased the volume of trading in 8000, Inc., by 93% and the company's stock price from less than $0.01 per share to $0.42 per share between November 2009 and October 2010.

Securities of 8000, Inc., a Virginia-based company, were quoted on OTC Pink operated by OTC Markets Group LLC (OTC Markets). The complaint alleges that Bryant and Kelly disseminated financial reports and press releases falsely representing that 8000, Inc. had millions of dollars in capital financing and revenues when, in fact, the company had neither. The complaint further alleges that, as they drove 8000, Inc.'s stock price higher with the false information, Bryant, of Hole Town, Barbados, sold 56.8 million shares of 8000, Inc. into the market, reaping substantial profits. The shares that Bryant sold were allegedly "restricted" shares that he should not have sold into the market at that time. Kelly, of Levittown, Pennsylvania, allegedly profited from the scheme by buying and selling the company's securities in the secondary market.

The Commission's complaint charges that Duncan, who served as securities counsel to 8000, Inc., participated in the scheme by providing false legal opinions to the company's transfer agent that improperly removed the restrictions on Bryant's shares and enabled Bryant to unlawfully sell the restricted shares into the market. According to the complaint, Duncan also provided false legal opinions to OTC Markets that ensured that 8000, Inc.'s common stock would continue to be quoted on OTC Pink. Duncan, of Bethesda, Maryland, received one million shares of 8000, Inc. from Bryant, but was impeded from selling those shares after the Commission issued an order on November 4, 2010, suspending trading in the securities of 8000, Inc.

The Commission alleges that 8000, Inc. violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and that Kelly and Bryant violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5(a) and (c) and that they aided and abetted the violations of Section 17(a) and Section 10(b) of the Exchange and Rule 10b-5 by 8000, Inc. The Commission also alleges Bryant is liable for 8000, Inc.'s violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 as the company's control person and that Bryan violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act. The Commission is seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement plus prejudgment interest, and civil penalties against 8000, Inc., Bryant and Kelly, and against Bryant and Kelly penny stock bars.

Duncan, who has agreed to settle the matter subject to Court approval, without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission's complaint, consented to the entry of a final judgment that would permanently enjoin him from violating Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and from preparing or issuing any opinion letter in connection with the offer or sale of securities pursuant to, or claiming an exemption under, Section 4(1) of the Securities Act and Rules 144 and 802 under the Securities Act, including without limitation, signing an opinion letter or preparing an opinion letter to be signed by another person, related to such offering. The final judgment would also permanently bar Duncan from participating in the offering of any penny stock and order him to disgorge the $15,570 in legal fees that he received from Bryant and to pay $524.98 in prejudgment interest and a $25,000 civil penalty. Duncan, in a related administrative proceeding to be instituted by the Commission, has also agreed to be permanently suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission as an attorney.

The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the Derbyshire, U.K. Police in this matter.

SEC Complaint
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2012/comp22495.pdf

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2012/lr22495.htm

[ctrumabll]

Happy News!

http://www.monkinabox.com/order.php?page=order

Monk-in-a-box is still on sale!

[ctrumabll]

Monkster still has enough pals to get things deleted? I thought that the old cultus was split between those who disappeared, and those who want to pretend that they were never part of the cult...

[Crazy Money]

The odd thing that many that have been scammed before are still getting scammed ... I have no idea what is up with Monkey now though da pals love to delete my posts on SCAMS, ban me from the boards and tell eveyone to put me on ignore just like back in the day.... they all end up in the same place... not sure why people can't handle others saying things opposite of what they are saying and just deal with it ... this is the freaking internet people... lolzzz... and long as you are not part of the SCAM behinds the sceens... there is nothing to worry about besides people getting so upset cause you say the SCAMS they love so much are going down... lolzzz

[ctrumabll]

Of course, the fun is just beginning!

Fight or flight for Monkster and Mel? I see Central America, since Canada has its own enforcement action involving the Monkster.

Any assets left for the loyal cult-dupes? Or, did he waste it all on Dom Perignon, or try to hide money in Belize?

Last, but not least: amongst the cult, who was scammed and who was in on the scam?

[Crazy Money]

They are slow... could have been 2010...

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/seeBans.aspx?boardid=2052

[David Fowler]

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 22420 / July 23, 2012

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jerry S. Williams, Monk’s Den, LLC, and First In Awareness, LLC, 3:12-cv-01068 (District of Connecticut, Complaint filed July 20, 2012)

SEC CHARGES STOCK PROMOTER IN INTERNET-BASED SCALPING SCHEME.

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on July 20, 2012, it filed a civil fraud action against former Connecticut resident Jerry S. Williams, a stock promoter, and two companies that he controlled, Monk’s Den, LLC and First In Awareness, LLC. The Commission charged Williams with running a scalping scheme from which he made over $2.4 million. Scalping is a type of fraud in which the owner of shares of a security recommends that security for investment and then immediately sells it at a profit upon the rise in market price which follows the recommendation.

The Commission’s Complaint alleges that from at least early 2009 through at least the end of 2010, Williams recommended two stocks, Cascadia Investments, Inc. and Green Oasis Environmental, Inc., to a large group of potential investors who followed his trading recommendations and strategies. According to the Complaint, Williams, who was known to his followers as “Monk,” used his internet-based message board (called “Monk’s Den”), in-person seminars (called “Monkinars”), and other means to encourage people to buy, hold, and accumulate Cascadia and Green Oasis stock. In particular, the Complaint alleges that Williams told potential investors that by buying up the outstanding shares, or float, of these companies, they could collectively trigger a “short squeeze” that would allow them to sell their stock to “market makers” that had shorted the stock. The Commission’s Complaint alleges that Williams falsely stated that he had previously used this strategy to make himself and others enormous profits. The Complaint alleges that in fact, unknown to potential investors, Williams had been hired by Cascadia and Green Oasis to promote their stock and had been compensated with millions of free and discounted shares of these stocks. According to the Complaint, Williams secretly sold millions of Cascadia and Green Oasis shares at the same time he was encouraging potential investors to buy, hold and accumulate these stocks. Through this scheme, the Complaint alleges, Williams made over $2.4 million.

The Commission’s Complaint charged Williams, First In Awareness, LLC and Monk’s Den, LLC with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5(a), (b), and (c) thereunder. The Commission also charged Williams with violating Sections 17(a)(1), 17(a)(2), 17(a)(3) and 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The Commission is seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties against each defendant and, as to Williams only, a penny stock bar.

The Commission’s investigation is continuing.

For further information, see Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release 34-63242 (November 4, 2010) [order suspending trading in the securities of 8000, Inc.].

SEC Complaint in this matter

[ctrumabll]

Well, it was slow in coming, but it happened.

At this point, is there anyone left who is surprised that Monkster was selling when telling everyone else to buy and hold?