While Jason is hyping AMBS to some extent. If you read the fine print, he is actually coming close to reporting independently. More importantly, he has been correct so far.
Please, let's not assume certitude where there is no evidence to support it. As for 'funny', perhaps you can provide a non-humerous answer as to how/why J.N arrives at the projected share totals shown below IF either the financing he said he 'expects in weeks' materializes, or your projected 'as good as done deal' with BD materializes.
In other words, the non-dilutive funding that Gerald alluded to materializes, OR it doesn't and J.N's share projections make sense.
It therefore seems that J.N is trying to hedge his bets/have it both ways in his analysis...deals and 'expected' funding or....dilution.
Also, we both know that AMBS pps is 'inelastic' to the content of posts! I can't drive it down with my posts....don't want to...and you can't drive it up with yours. Plenty of evidence to support THAT!
(Date of analysis can be inferred from the 'current price' date quoted in the analysis.)