She is hyping the stock.
The tactic she is using is just as I described- using a legitimate news article, that has nothing to do with this company, and implying that somehow it does.
If you read any article on HOW TO HYPE A STOCK you will find this listed as a useful method.
I posted information on how to value this stock, not an opinion based upon something that has nothing to do with GNTA. I replied to her post by offering a legitimate method to put a value on this stock, and others.
By your standard (and her's) if I decided to start a car company, sold a few billion shares to get it started; never sold a single car; I could then start pointing to articles about Ford and GM to show how successful my business "could" be. Really?
GNTA is a developmental biotech company. The companies in the article she posted are established productive companies. They have real revenue (in one case over a billion a year) and good shares structures. There is no comparison.