insuficient. curent writen docs will reflect what? try that on for size try and lawyer me complete transactional writen docs will reflect what? answer that as if past records are complete if stock" removed" admit removed is a transaction and will show in writen form permineant non ownership as well as close any short position that may be tied to such shares .
What a silly question! Most personal property has no "proof of ownership" attached to it, so the question is frivolous to begin with. If revoked shares are held by a brokerage, the record of ownership is not obliterated by removing the shares from the brokerage's electronic bookkeeping system, and the brokerage will show the ownership, and removal of the shares, on the last statement on which the holding appears. Where's the "proof of ownership" of the shares which are not removed from your brokerage account right now? There is none, other than for the written documents issued by the broker.
Ill be direct since ya want to lawyer talk; removal is equivalent to sale as far as the brokers writen documants are concerned right? If not specify the diferance useing current writen docs because there aint none. Chain of title is broken same problem robo signers have. chain of title is broken ....people dont fall for this proof is losy and judge will not give back. Also the property personal you speak of is in your possesion most ffgo shares never were because of iou ;electronic digit all we have...Im telling yaul no chain of title or ownership will occur if "removed" from account. Dont fall for it.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
