News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Frankinjohn74

06/02/12 12:38 PM

#49096 RE: Tapco1 #49092

Regards Dutchess; still here or not?: In absense of last Q being amended, or the prospectus Friday saying their agreement with MMRG is terminated; I am waiting on an 8K to confirm they are indeed gone. A post by a third party on I-Hub saying "the company says they are gone" isnt enough as per SEC. Otherwise investors must presume Dutchess agreement is still in effect; their agreement is not terminated with MMRG.
http://www.sec.gov/answers/form8k.htm
icon url

tiffer

06/02/12 1:03 PM

#49098 RE: Tapco1 #49092

Love your imagination and spot on analogy which presented facts in a very entertaining scenario. Thanks, I like the laughter from my wife especially as she remarked; He sure got that right! Tif
icon url

dipstick55

06/02/12 8:55 PM

#49107 RE: Tapco1 #49092

LOL, Thanks Tapco.....Is that legal? Does BL of MMRF with paid car expenses using this vehicle for any RHL business? Or do they change cars? What about phone? Are the conversations on phone about MMRF seperated from calls about RHL Group?

Or is it 2 seperate phones? Why not use the same office, turn down some lights, cut some staff, get a bicycle, No more huge office room, pay your own insurance, pay for your own vehicle, quit consulting with the mirror. Only send 1 person to a show, 4 is not producing. Take a Greyhound to the show. MMRF can save shareholders a couple bucks. And with a PPS at .014, a couple bucks is huge.
JMHO