InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

luckyone1021

05/23/12 8:05 AM

#50127 RE: Shortshooter #50126

Cost shareholders money? Yes, if they shot themselves in the foot by being shortsighted & sold at a loss....stocks go up and down regardless of fundamentals, but the fundamentals over time will prevail and drive the PPS skyward....but, you really know this, now , don't ya? :) $$KMAG
icon url

ameen123

05/23/12 8:08 AM

#50131 RE: Shortshooter #50126

Good Morning Ladies and Gents

if we break .0055 steadily and strongly today and hold then it is the reversal . . just look to the chart how this started when we started the 1st run from .0055 to .023

very bulish if we break the .0055 today
icon url

Think or Swim

05/23/12 8:26 AM

#50135 RE: Shortshooter #50126

That depends on where your entry point was my friend.

I'll say this. For a pink sheeter KMAG holds as much potential as any ticker I have seen at this level. They have no debt, increasing revenues, royalties, transparent CEO, willingness to take the necessary steps to uplist, shareholder friendly, and a product that is heavily in demand that the CEO holds some of the patents for.

What more could you ask for?

The only wrong here is the share price:) If you don't believe that KMAG represents a good risk/reward ratio then that is your perogative and I respect that.

This is wild west pinkyland. This is why were here. If I wanted 10% returns I'd play the blue chippers. 400% to 1000% short term returns in KMAG far outweigh the downside risk.
icon url

Oscar Boomer

05/23/12 8:28 AM

#50136 RE: Shortshooter #50126

It's a pink, fundamentals don't count for a lot. Also, it's only a loss when your retarded enough to sell.