Technical Analysis is essentially useless on penny stocks.
Vorticity, again I not only agree with you on "charting" but have stated my position as plainly as possible in the header. This has been shown to be true time and time again by CHDO.
Yes, on heavily traded big board stocks with a long history to base trendlines on, T/A can give an indication of prevailing direction. T/A is really more suited to indices or their dependencies such as the DOW, Triple Q, or ETF's. And even there, a simple "Greek Tragedy" or the European election results can throw a long term uptrend into an unexpected and un-forecast loop. (See QQQ for example)
The most ludicrous of the failed CHDO predictions involves the ever popular "Golden Cross" This can be a legitimate indicator but only if you understand how it works. Too many CHDO "chartists" begin salivating over a Golden Cross whenever a short term average drifts towards a longer term average. Any time averages increase, it is a positive sign BUT ...........
For a true CHDO Golden Cross to exist, four conditions should be met:
(1) Both averages, as the cross approaches, should be trending upward, even if only slightly. They will be essentially parallel at the time
(2) The shorter average must cross the longer sharply, usually between 30 and 45 degrees. Oozing across doesn't count.
(3) The cross must be accompanied by an increase in volume.
(4) the shorter average must maintain its upward momenum long enough to establish a viable trend.
You will not find these qualification spelled out on many internet definitions of the Golden Cross because those are oversimplified for the average reader. However, if you look at the illustrations accompanying the text, you will clearly see that at least three out of the four conditions above will be met.
Sorry to be pedantic but the inaccurate posts about Golden Crosses on this CHDO board are more than annoying, they are misleading and therefore harmful.