Replies to post #124 on Tibet Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TBET)

[The Rainmaker]

So they are trying to scare people into thinking the CEO could lose control of a valuable subsidiary? Your posts are made to show this is not true and the only one with true control is the CEO who is trying to buy back everyone elses shares for $3.00 and take TBET private. Is that correct?

[capitalismforever]

Don't know if I understand what you're saying due to the unusual way you've tried to explain it, however I believe I understand what you're trying to say. In the most simplest way to put it, ultimately the structure means nothing because the most important thing to remember is this: according to PRC law, no monies can be physically transferred from a Chinese business to its foreign controlling interest.