InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

IH Admin [Shelly]

12/03/11 3:49 PM

#155435 RE: Slojab #155431

Mods are going to have to work that out amongst themselves. No appeals to Admin.
icon url

altruism

12/03/11 4:42 PM

#155448 RE: Slojab #155431

It's been that way though, I've put up stickies and had assist remove and put up ones that they thought were more important, alot of times the board lets us know which ones they'd like sickied which really is the way it should be....
icon url

Nilbud

12/04/11 12:10 PM

#155598 RE: Slojab #155431

I find myself agreeing with slojab - What is the world coming to? lol(:
icon url

Stock_Barber

12/04/11 1:32 PM

#155624 RE: Slojab #155431

If one mod removes it and another reinstates it, do we go back and forth removing/restoring it or appeal to admin like I might on a post that the same thing sometimes happens with?


I see a problem with that... any stickied post over 48 hours old that is removed as a sticky, can't be restickied according to the rules...

Any post that is more than 48 hours old can no longer be added to the sticky list.


I'm curious how this will be handled...


icon url

doughboy2

12/04/11 3:44 PM

#155647 RE: Slojab #155431

Oops - just read new rule.
icon url

lrice

12/06/11 1:16 AM

#155789 RE: Slojab #155431

Good question, slojab: The six-headed hydra determines sticky-posts is answer to your question :)

=====================
Who determines which posts are "sticky worthy" and will be stickied/removed?

Example. If there are already 4 posts stickied and one is just a lot of bs, who determines if it should stay or be removed?

If one mod removes it and another reinstates it, do we go back and forth removing/restoring it or appeal to admin like I might on a post that the same thing sometimes happens with?
============================