InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

lbdave

12/02/11 10:33 AM

#178782 RE: MovedOn #178781

Maybe you need to read Dennis' post again, because his comparision is incorrect when quantifing sales growth, and your agreement makes you assumption incorrect as well.
icon url

butcherman

12/02/11 10:33 AM

#178783 RE: MovedOn #178781

I have to agree with Ferrari5! Hello!
icon url

Beevo

12/02/11 11:25 AM

#178787 RE: MovedOn #178781

Hello! No. The time frame is the same but the data is not.

Would you compare Q4 vs Q2 of a Toy company?

He also just picks just two random Q's. They teach in statistics that you can manipulate stats all day.

Q32010 - Q32011 = -13,379. That 36k stuff he is talking about is meaningless.(in business terms).

I could use Q2 2011 vs Q1 2011 = +83,977

Thats a 80% gain not a a 12.6% loss.

I didn't attack his opinion or point. I just brought something up about HOW he got to that point.