InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

butch258

11/08/11 10:35 AM

#27169 RE: shotcallers #27168

DITTO!
icon url

Wayne Rosso

11/08/11 2:40 PM

#27171 RE: shotcallers #27168

Everything I wrote is in the public record. Each side makes its statements through their legal pleadings and the courts issue written judgments. Every side is thus represented in the public forum. Ergo it has the added benefit of the truth.
icon url

aacdude

11/08/11 7:19 PM

#27173 RE: shotcallers #27168

Is it all true? If it wasn't, why would all of these people be suing the company for money owed? Furthermore, why would the company and the CEO not respond to most of the claims and take a default judgment in court? After all, if the claims were untrue, wouldn't you want to defend your reputation and avoid having to pay millions?! If you read the court filings, it's pretty obvious that the individuals are suing because they are upset that they were not paid back the money they agreed to lend based on signed legal documents between both parties. What other "side" to the story is there? Unless you are referring to the part of the story where BLLN squandered away all of the money with nothing to show for it.