Replies to post #23872 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[Personalizit]

For one thing, it's Airclic, not Airclick.

[lesnshawn]

KGR: Wow, now that's some digging. I think you may be onto something. Thank you for that. Have a great time. lns

[Rotten Johnny]

KGR AirClic is still around

Working with NexTel:

http://www.airclic.com/nexteldemo.asp

Home link:

http://www.airclic.com/index.asp

New round of funding from Zon Capital:

http://www.airclic.com/release6.asp

AirClic is an old rival of NEOM's. NEOM has been in the ring with them before and it all comes down to one thing: patent validation and enforcement, which is why the Virgin settlement (with public disclosure) maybe NEOM's most potent tool against them yet.

A number of us have said all along, it is better to work with NEOM than against them for many practical reasons. There will be an abundance of wealth created in this new market niche and plenty to go around as well. Whats the old saying? "We can do together what we could not do alone."

I for one am all for partnering and licensing rather than court litigation.

http://www.neom.com/press_releases/2002/20020201.jsp

With that said, I also realized that BP&G law firm would not have taken this on a contingency basis if they did not feel this were a slam dunk.

http://www.bpglaw.com/

BP&G are over the top when it comes down to intensive patent litigation. They are well versed, well connected, savy and are a very capable contender in the judicial arena.

All the Best, JP

[ss9173]

KGR, Airclic is alive and well. As Personalizit indicated you had misspelled the company name.

This link will give you an update of their most recent press releases.

http://www.airclic.com/news.asp

Also, according to their website, Nextel is still a partner as is Motorola and Symbol

http://www.airclic.com/partners.asp

Regarding the Neom lawsuit, this is from the June 20, 2005 S-4 Amendment:

On April 19, 2004, AirClic filed a declaratory judgment action against NeoMedia in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. NeoMedia answered and counterclaimed on May 18, 2004. AirClic answered NeoMedia's counterclaim on June 10, 2004. On April 20, 2004, NeoMedia re-filed its suit against AirClic in Pennsylvania for patent infringement. AirClic answered and counterclaimed on May 13, 2004. NeoMedia filed its answer to AirClic's counterclaims on June 2, 2004. NeoMedia filed an amended complaint on July 1, 2004, and AirClic answered and counterclaimed on July 20, 2004. NeoMedia's answer to AirClic's counterclaims was filed on August 3, 2004. The two actions were consolidated and the parties are currently engaged in discovery and discussing settlement opportunities.

SS9173

[Drmyke3]

has anyone checked on woogerbear? He promised news this week and there was none. He promised an e-mail and there was none. Could someone phone him and see if he's OK?
Thanx in advance