InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

TFWG

05/08/05 10:52 AM

#106260 RE: laranger #106254

ranger, personally, I have not given his comments that much thought. I just hope he's at the fax machine over the next few days exchanging love notes with Jorma.

May 31st is coming.

BTW, wouldn't it be something if they both asked the ICC for a delay? Man, the street would go crazy.

Regards,

Bob
icon url

nessco

05/08/05 11:04 AM

#106262 RE: laranger #106254

What he said was. If we get a positive decision, we could enforce it.
That's an important "if"
Nessco
icon url

Desert dweller

05/08/05 11:05 AM

#106263 RE: laranger #106254

Ranger, not to bring you down, but here is the comment from the transcript, it is not exactly as you think:

"And so we have remained open to fashion deals that make sense for us, but if there's not a deal in the offering, and the result is positive, then we would move forward on executing on the judgment."

I still believe we are going to win, but as you can see, he didn't let anything at all slip, although when I first heard the comment, I don't remember hearing the underlined part either.

BTW, did you read your messages?