Replies to post #2903 on Intel Corp (INTC)

[spokeshave]

Elmer: Yes you are confused about your own statement. You claimed End of '03 for 90nm. Not Prescott, you said 90nm.

If the only thing you intend to contribute to the discussion is a critique of my semantics, please let me know, and I will quit responding. Regardless of whether I stated "90nm" or "Prescott" the fact remains that Intel, as recently as this summer, intended to have a 90nm product in 1H03. Now, no 90nm product appears on the official Intel roadmap at all for 1H03.

If there is a delay then Intel could use another product as a lead vehicle. Why not?

Which vehicle did you have in mind?