InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Loonley Tunes

02/03/11 2:39 PM

#4951 RE: Atlanta1 #4949

Nothing ....

but you have to look that VIVK Chairman has a key role in the company that was paid to VIVK shareholder as dividend. And for that imo was right from the company to tell to their shareholders that VIVK Chairman has now a new job.






icon url

richrichrich

02/03/11 3:00 PM

#4953 RE: Atlanta1 #4949

Perhaps just long term shareholder confidence, that they can hold true to ANY claim. I think this would indirectly help newer shareholders, to gain trust, in a company that is "moving forward", on their promises......BTW, I currently wonder if the div is ever coming through. So I called FINRA this morning. They referred me to OTCBB, which I also called. They referred me to a complaint department, in which they referred me back to filing a FINRA complaint, online. None of these mentioned parties have "power", or jurisdiction in such matters. Of course, if FINRA can not resolve the matter, or get an answer from the company(as in they don't answer the phone), then FINRA forwards the complaint to the SEC advocacy department. If they can't find an answer, then it moves up the chain, to becoming an official "fraud" investigation.....I haven't filed a full FINRA complaint yet, as I'll be kind, and allow VIVK til say Monday, to possibly inform us via a news bulletin......Any long term shareholders out there, that feel this is a wrong move, or that it will "scar" the company in any way, please feel free to comment. I feel it may be needed, to ignite the flames under their buttocks, to at least get them going, on the dividend.......I don't feel the dividend is in any way related to the possible merge, other than to help along "investor confidence", from its completion, forward. For now, until it is in our hands, I think it is still a VIVK "subject".