News Focus
News Focus
icon url

xnxsxx

01/12/11 11:31 PM

#4055 RE: sts66 #4054

I think they are... who would want to short right now? perhaps they covered already from the smaller dip
icon url

Dakota Option

01/13/11 5:09 AM

#4056 RE: sts66 #4054

To top it off ZACKS ON THE 11TH PUT A DOWNGRADE --UNDERPERFORM --{what B.S} The gurus at Zacks have no clue--its a technical underperform by ZACKS because of the short sellers they see and knowing more expenses then usual by the next Quarter will be seen because of Nuedexta launch---SO WHAT is ZACKS saying pps hits 10 bucks instead of 15 --15 instead of 20, ZACKS HAD NO EFFECT ON PPS and will eventually change back to neutral or out perform when they see pps climbing with the potential sales of the "ONLY " PBA drug approved out there by the FDA---launch news and BTW ZACKS GAVE NO REASON --LOL
icon url

pennybuffet

01/13/11 1:38 PM

#4060 RE: sts66 #4054

well after what happened right before the approval I am inclined to think that shorters believe they can just run this thing down real quick and cover if they need to. As long as the PPS stays below that critical $5 range that is what shorters will try and do, at least that is what I believe.
icon url

Topgun21

01/13/11 11:53 PM

#4061 RE: sts66 #4054

Yes, I really think they are just like when they did there "bear raid" that day of approval etc.

Time to make the shorts cover in very short order!

Tim
AVNR