Um, they have to be prepared. That's what laywers do. Of course they aren't going to show any fear. They haven't done so before, why would they do so now? It would give the EC a clear advantage which they obviously don't want to do.
Question: Why don't you ever raise similar points about the EC's strategy? For example, I don't recall you ever pointing out similar thoughts to those who were underestimating the EC's strategy after the examiner's report. Whatever happened with that examiner's report? Was it ever used in court?
Not making a big deal of the sealed document either. The judge already knows what it's about and has made up her decision regarding the POR...just a matter of writing up the opinion/decision. The POR decision is the what will make PPS had south or north really fast.
Just keep in mind what she said at the second to last comfirmation hearing day.
[paraphrasing]" I'll make my decision based on evidence/facts not any counsels opinion or argument."
That statement is what has kept me from selling and taking some profit. The debtors have provided little evidence and and a lot of opinions and arguments to support the POR. The burden of proof is on them not another party to come up with a better solution, as some have suggested.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
