InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

laranger

03/10/05 10:32 AM

#97671 RE: Desert dweller #97669

Howard says several panels in Paris will review the tribunal decision, to make sure it's on solid footing.

No doubt about it.

Even the ICC expects that NOK may challenge, if given an opening.


icon url

Corp_Buyer

03/10/05 10:37 AM

#97673 RE: Desert dweller #97669

Arb appeal "reason is..for gross misconduct" - Nok may be expected to appeal an adverse arbitration ruling on the grounds that the panel acted improperly by disregarding the (limited) scope and (noninfringement of) patents as "relevant factors" in setting the royalty rates for Nok. This has been a major point of difference between IDCC and Nok all along.

Of course, Nok may claim other grounds as well. IDCC may need to enforce any arb. ruling against Nok.

I expect the confirmation, enforcement, and appeal of arb. rulings to proceed pretty routinely and quickly.

MO,
Corp_Buyer