Amen, brother.
I would like to figure out the cause but it is obviously multi-factorial. Immunodeficiency makes sense with recent advances (DNDN), correlation of HPV and cervical cancer, etc.
But obviously carcinogens make sense too. I think most scientists are cautious before they accept new evidence. Those pursuing fringe theories, or worse, accepting them as fact with scant evidence, will fail in their endeavors. Your moderator seems to harbor this method - undoubtedly this is what led him and you all to investing in NNVC. I urge you caution before accepting specious findings as fact. The conversion from specious to fact is what makes people rich, no doubt. However I think the analysis of this conversion is what it is important - not assuming and defending it. I suspect there is no way this technology moves out of the fringe, specious, dubious category - which is what it has been since AllExcel etc. What is that, 20 years? I believe things can come out of left field but this is unlikely.