InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BonelessCat

10/07/10 5:11 PM

#39284 RE: NNVClover #39283

Pure nonsense. There are not trillions of cells available to a virus. Viruses are limited by cell type, temperature, body region, cell function, among others. There are a very limited number of targets for viruses as opposed to billions of nanoviricide particles completely unrestricted by membranes and other semipermiable barriers. A nanoviricide can even cross the blood brain barrier, something even viruses mostly can't do.

You are so off the mark here.
icon url

Ubertino

10/07/10 5:11 PM

#39285 RE: NNVClover #39283

I do nothing but great work!

You?

I have my doubts - growing daily.

I think you are about done - your credibility is very questionable.

What will you do next?
icon url

Echo20

10/07/10 5:15 PM

#39287 RE: NNVClover #39283

NNVClover,

The problem here is there is no such thing as a "virus ligand
".

This is what is being tested and what is new.

What if it works and you are 500,000 short?

Echo20
icon url

keltoi

10/07/10 5:28 PM

#39288 RE: NNVClover #39283

Stop playing semantics.You know what is being said.Just because the term "protein ligand" was convoluted into "virus ligand " doesn't mean you can't understand the train of thought.

Do I have to "Grade you" on spelling and punctuation also? Oh BTW
Any "Tom , Dick and Harry" can say how many zillions of shares they've shorted or bought.The only thing that impresses me about your behavior here is the arrogance and "Twisted" facts and terminology.

I hope at least that you are impressing yourself because you're not impressing anyone else.Be truthful (People can sense truth).

If you are doing me any favors at all it is keeping the share prices down long enough for me to scrape up more money to BUY MORE!!!!!!!