InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ziploc_1

02/17/05 6:15 AM

#95373 RE: loophole73 #95369

Loop: I feel that the panel will decide that Ericy is a trigger and that this is more important than the amount of money awarded. I see the following scenario: The Nok 2G validity challenge in the U.K. is not a serious impediment because the future of Idcc lies in 3G in any event We should be able to defend our 3G patents in the Nok 3G validity challenge in court. After Ericy is determined to be a trigger, they will either sign relatively quickly for 3G or Idcc will need to initiate court proceedings against them, which hopefully will trigger Nok for 3G. Since we are stronger in 3G than in 2G, I would anticipate a positive result. This would then open the doors for Idcc to achieve its potential. IMO
icon url

laranger

02/17/05 8:38 AM

#95376 RE: loophole73 #95369

Loop.

You said, "Even Nok has stated that they made offers of settlement in their SEC filings that were rejected by IDCC."

Do you recall the filing date? I must have missed that one.