InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jjff

02/11/05 9:52 AM

#94710 RE: whizzeresq #94709

Shouldn`t this be positive for us? Where`s the uptick! LOL
icon url

laranger

02/11/05 9:56 AM

#94712 RE: whizzeresq #94709

Whizz.

Does this appear to mean that the judge believes NOK already has enough information, and the parties should agree as to how much of that information can be made public, in the UK suit?
icon url

ams13sag

02/11/05 10:04 AM

#94717 RE: whizzeresq #94709

Does this mean the costs associated with the appeal will belong to Nokia.

ams
icon url

laranger

02/11/05 10:12 AM

#94720 RE: whizzeresq #94709

Whizz.

"In North Carolina case, the Court heard oral argument in December on the same Motion by Nokia brought against Sony-Ericy. No decision has yet been posted."

Is it likely that the court in NC will hear about the Texas decision?