whizzeresq: Quick question. Since apparently different case law affects the situation, in the arbitration case filings didn't Nokia claim that the requests were not for discovery, and Ericsson rebutted this argument?
whizzeresq: to my knowledge ERICY has never ask this question of NOK. Why if you are so smart & you say IDCC does not have what they say, why did you let us ERICY fight it out for over ten years? Why have you not said anything till now?????? You said NOK had the idea IDCC would lose. Why & what did you base this on??? Could ERICY ask these question of NOK.
So, why wouldn't NOK go to a NY court with a discovery subpoena? According to many filings, the formal arbitration process is highly supported by U.S. law.
Also, if NOK lost in Texas, what's the big deal if they also lose in NY?
Sorry for being a pest. But so much of what's going on just doesn't make sense.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
