InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

xclr8r

05/04/10 4:17 PM

#117906 RE: jimmy james #117905

Whether the MM's actually monitor stock boards or not is a matter of contention too, some (most) arguing that the dirty rotten scoundrels have too many stock transactions going on to be concerned with one over another, which makes sense. On the other hand, I'm a conspiracy theorist from way back, and if the news gets around - remember, we had our own MM once upon a time - that you've got a real "diamond in the rough" company out there that is going places, who's to say that they don't talk amongst themselves to kill momo for any of them....right JOE??

Any others with opinions about mentioning the dirty rotten scoundrels who conspire to kill any upstart companies by shorting shares?

GLTYA.....
icon url

vinchenz

05/04/10 4:26 PM

#117908 RE: jimmy james #117905

WE WANT NAMES AND WE WANT TO POINT FINGERS
icon url

qtipjoe

05/04/10 5:15 PM

#117912 RE: jimmy james #117905

The fact that you think the mm read your words is laughable. The fact that you would fear them if they did is quite telling. I have never been to a party where someone introduced him or her self as an mm. If I had it would make great reading in the huffington post.