InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

mabsurgood

03/19/10 11:34 AM

#12798 RE: ohbull2000 #12795

That does legitimize the deal. imo
icon url

reillyaceofspies

03/19/10 11:37 AM

#12801 RE: ohbull2000 #12795

VARIOUS EXPLANATIONS

Below is yet another link that adds to my belief that, overall, metal matrix use and production is an area that will explode.

That is separate from the buyout issue. I think the theories re: white knights, reverse mergers, PIPE gone bad, and even scam have their merits.

The lack of objective information is concerning but, we are all in this to make money. Were it guaranteed to make me 0.01 per share on 10 April it would probably be available to me for ~0.01 right now.

Getting emotional and insulting other posters who are trying to reason this out is counterproductive. I like the spirit of the board today and am interested to see if this tone continues until the buyout issue is settled.

http://www.lockheedmartin.com/news/press_releases/2009/090603ae_acca-firstflight.html
icon url

oldbee

03/19/10 11:40 AM

#12805 RE: ohbull2000 #12795

also if they were REALLY trying to hide something they would have gagged the T/A
icon url

afxm

03/19/10 12:00 PM

#12832 RE: ohbull2000 #12795

That makes very good sense. Thresher has been contracting with a high profile Defense Contractor since 2004.
The Board of Directors would not have allowed Flessner to perpetrate a fraud and jeopardize thier relationship with any future business prospects.
If they did, the chairman needs to be fired and they to need to hire me.
I would have raised roof off of the building if an out of control ceo was making psychotic remarks that was being picked by every tom dick and harry website on the internet.
They would need to hire football stadium full of attorneys to handle the # of lawsuits being filed. Pink sheet or blue chip, it doesn't matter.