InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

steel58

03/18/10 10:56 AM

#176394 RE: climberprof #176382

climber... Maybe they figured better not p*ss the judge off, since she would obvious reject the objections anyway.
icon url

OrnateSilk

03/18/10 11:12 AM

#176414 RE: climberprof #176382

A lot of times it is nothing more than knowing which battle to pick.

All parties knew the judge was in favor of establishing the EC. They also knew that if they objected, it would most likely be overruled. Why object to something that is going to make you appear inhuman? Especially when there is a 99.9% chance going in that it will be overruled with a hard thud?

icon url

GO4AWILDRIDE

03/18/10 12:29 PM

#176478 RE: climberprof #176382

JPM & FDIC need the EC to get into the settlement or risk another suit from the shareholder if they are left out of the settlement.

Only way to put this to bed is to include all parties.

Sealing the documents will also protect them from the DOJ.

It is a smart thing on JPM's part to NOT OBJECT, only WMI who is now the enemy of the EC would object, they did not as they knew it was useless.
icon url

BuyHigh-N-SellLow

03/18/10 6:48 PM

#176725 RE: climberprof #176382

TL;DR