InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BoilerRoom

02/24/10 11:32 PM

#25395 RE: gussy1 #25392

At that time I did not know if katx was promoted it would hurt us in the long run. I'm against it now.
icon url

Biochemist2002

02/25/10 12:38 AM

#25405 RE: gussy1 #25392

Manz's a good guy (or girl?), whose heart was in the right place and was just excited about KAT (rightfully)-and he's since learned that wasn't such a good idea (hence the 180). Hehe, not all of us are professional stock brokers (especially me)...some are just learning the ropes as we go. Until that conversation the other day, I wouldn't have really thought of promoting a stock as necessarily being a bad thing. Take that how you will, but I don't think that means I've done any less DD, it just never occurred to me that it would be bad (probably because I wouldn't have had bad intentions in the first place). But now I can see how there can be a wrong way and a right way to promote a stock, in the sense that the wrong way would be to blindly "pump" a stock, which would not be a good thing. I think most on here have made a pretty good attempt to do some DD (according to their abilities), so as to not blindly promote a stock. Of course some of us, including myself, are still "amateurs" when it comes to the terminology and inner workings of the stock market. No offense Munz, I'm not saying you're an amateur, just speaking for myself. I know I have to look up a new phrase or term every other day to keep up with some of the investing lingo. And I still don't fully understand how "shorting" works. But I do know (for the reasons I've previously posted) that I'm confident in KAT-she's so awesome right now that it is hard to not get too excited or "emotionally attached" to it. Anyways, take care gussy and have a good evening and I wish you all the best of luck.

P.S. I wasn't trying to be rude, I was just saying I think Munz meant well (IMHO). GLTA