lastdog, If the company is so ignorant, inept, or disorganized so as NOT to have a method for validating/verifying the claims of their distributors (such as a damn simple phone call to the CUSTOMER) PRIOR to issuing a PR, then maybe they don't deserve to be cut much slack on the aspect of who's onus such a screw-up is? There's no good excuse for such a thing. You heard the phrase, "They can't get out of their own way"? Sounds like it may fit. So, I can only assume it was intentional, or totally inept, due to the fact that it was not corrected but was silently taken off their website instead. And obviously ignored otherwise.
People buy stock based directly on such misleading press, period. That's all that needs to be said about this. How many other past BIG PRs were some altered version of the truth as well? Either due to staff incompetence, or intentional, doesn't matter. One has to wonder. Maybe this is why so many things are announced and then never heard of again. Creative truthfulness or pre-emptive speaking out. It all makes more sense to me now.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
