spree -- the massive amount of material re 9/11 that has been (and continues and will continue to be) presented on this board includes voluminous facts, and many quite reasonable analyses/theories working from those facts, that go far beyond the politically constrained and manifestly incomplete, if not also in many respects utterly false, 9/11 commission report -- that's all the answer I or Amy or anyone here owes you in reponse to your conclusory assertions -- the effort is ongoing -- we're looking at all kinds of stuff, without having already made up our minds that we know just what happened, and without having decided that certain figures/entities just could not possibly have been involved (which only makes sense, because we're still not satisfied we've come to a good enough understanding of what happened, which is why we're still asking questions and looking for answers in the first place)
if you can and want to actually specifically deconstruct anything that's been posted here about 9/11 that you think is wrong, and/or to specifically add material to the discussion of 9/11 here that you've found and do like, then by all means go ahead, please do -- if you've got good sourcing and make good sense with your specific comments, your effort will be recognized as a real contribution to the ongoing effort to understand 9/11, and will be taken into consideration as such -- but your periodic 'oh that's all bullshit and anyone who even considers such stuff is insane' responses don't answer or settle anything
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
