InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BCInvestor

07/07/09 10:34 AM

#35731 RE: sneaky_peaky #35728

WOW, again with the consipiricy theory. Could it possibly be that DKAM is being sued because DKAM defaulted on their contract with LIQR or is that too simple to comprehend? (No, it certainly must have something to do with Naked, Canadian Short Selling Hedge Funds whom are plotting against DKAM by embedding bean-counters at LIQR to force a DKAM default timed exactly 6 months prior to their Kidd Rock beer announcement so that the 8K comes out the same day as the announcement to crush the $1 per share prediction of certain members of this board!)

AND AS FOR MEETING INSIDERS, it seems that someone here has a direct bat-phone line with PK of DKAM, considering he claimed to have the secret financial data showing LIQR as defalting with DKAM, which he claims he posted then took down. Funny how that works...

DKAM did not attend the LARGEST LIQUOR CONFERENCE IN THE USA for the past two years in a row, why not? (Inquiring minds want to know.) That was enough for me to know their stock was going down fast, regardless of what their suppliers, distributors and brokers all have to say about DKAM. Some of you here should call the big boys like Southern and Charmer and ask them why the do not like DKAM, it may have to do with money owed from DKAM...

The results speak for themselves...



icon url

duke00324

07/07/09 6:10 PM

#35764 RE: sneaky_peaky #35728

...I tend to wholeheartedly agree with your assertion...

...that : "nobody ever bashes a bad stock or company."...

...of course, your "idea" of a "bad stock or company" differs quite broadly from mine...

...this is, as we speak, a "bad stock"...Duke...