LMAO...did you actually bother to read this legal opinion before posting this footnote to it here? Do you really know what you posted?
"Harris and Crews made numerous arguments at the hearing below, and on appeal to us, that repeat the arguments made and rejected by the District Court. For example, they contend that they did not participate in the manipulative sales of the stock and that they did not profit, or receive any gains, from the scheme and that the statements found by the court and the law judge to be false and misleading are not actionable because they are forward-looking statements of opinion."
they lost...twice... trying to use the argument your supporting.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
