InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

chichi2

03/19/08 8:09 AM

#28036 RE: bob3 #27725

WallStreetJournal Headlines >>

Write-Downs Hurt Morgan Stanley

Morgan Stanley posted a 42% drop in net income, as the investment bank took an additional $2.3 billion in write-downs. The results were better than expected and shares rose in pre-market trading. 8:06 a.m.




Bear's Run-Up Sets Stage for Clash


Bear Stearns's shares soared 23% on bets that J.P. Morgan will have to pay more for the firm, setting up a high-stakes game of brinksmanship between investors, the Fed and J.P. Morgan.
• 'Paltry' Exit Packages for Bear Executives
• Business: Was Another Ending Possible for Bear?
• Deal Journal: Bear, Confidence and Our First Poll
• Economics Blog: Volcker Says Fed Role Raises Questions



Futures Fall as Jitters Resurface

U.S. stock futures pulled back, as investors' glee from Fed moves and strong bank earnings a day earlier gave way to renewed liquidity concerns. 8:03 a.m.

clikc on rplied2 to get URL to journal
icon url

chichi2

04/10/08 10:16 PM

#28462 RE: bob3 #27725

Economists Say U.S. Hasn't Hit Bottom Yet
By Phil Izzo, Wall Street Journal
April 10, 2008

The weakening U.S. economy has further to fall, according to the majority of economists in the latest Wall Street Journal forecasting survey.

By a 3-to-1 ratio, respondents said the economy is in a recession, and almost three-quarters said the economy hasn't yet hit bottom. "It's hard to say," said Lou Crandall of Wrightson ICAP, because "it doesn't feel like anything we've experienced in decades."

The survey was the first since the Federal Reserve's intervention to prevent the collapse of investment bank Bear Stearns Cos. The vast majority of economists -- 80% of the 46 who answered the question -- approved of the Fed's handling of the Bear Stearns situation.

That didn't translate, into high marks for Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke or Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who also was closely involved in the deal. The Fed chairman's grade rose slightly to 78 out of 100 from 75 in February, the last time the survey asked about his performance, but it is still far below the 92 he scored in September. Mr. Paulson's grade dropped slightly -- to 73 from 74 in February. "Bernanke has been too slow," said David Resler of Nomura Securities.

David Wyss of Standard & Poor's Corp. said the Fed was behind the curve through most of last year, moving too slowly in dealing with the credit turmoil, but it has caught up since January. The central bank's unconventional moves are "better than sitting there and watching the world fall apart because you don't have the perfect solution," he said.


Three interrelated issues weighed on the economists' minds. When asked what the biggest downside risk to their forecast was, 35% said further deterioration in the credit markets, while 25% said it was a sharp drop in consumer spending and 13% said continued housing weakness.

Richard DeKaser of National City Corp. was among those who said the economy soon will start to recover. "First, we've begun to see some stabilization in existing- and new-home sales," he said. "Second, the uncertainties plaguing the credit markets are beginning to narrow. And third, the policy actions taken by the government [the economic-stimulus package and Fed rate cuts] will begin to take effect soon."

Mr. Wyss isn't convinced. "Home prices are still diving," he said. "I won't believe that home sales have stabilized until we see the spring numbers, that's when activity picks up." He also said he suspects that consumer spending will slow further.

Ian Shepherdson of High Frequency Economics agrees. "I expect soft consumption will keep growth way below trend right through next year and I would not be surprised by a soft 2010 either," he said. "You can't party for a decade, stop on Saturday and expect the hangover to be gone by Sunday lunchtime so you can go out and start all over again."

Unemployment forecasts supported the point on consumption. After three consecutive drops in nonfarm payrolls, the economists said they now expect the economy to shed an average 1,625 jobs a month over the next year. They expect the unemployment rate, now 5.1%, to rise to 5.6% by December. Meanwhile, just 21% of the economists expect home prices to hit bottom this year, while 67% see the bottom next year and 12% say it won't be until 2010.


The Wall Street Journal surveys a group of 55 economists throughout the year. Broad surveys on more than 10 major economic indicators are conducted every month. Once a year, economists are ranked on how well their forecasts have fared. For prior installments of the surveys, see: WSJ.com/Economists.The respondents on average expect U.S. gross domestic product, which grew at a slim 0.6% annual rate in the fourth quarter, to expand by an anemic 0.2% in the first quarter and 0.1% in the second, followed by a 2.1% increase in the third quarter. Most of the economists said they expect a contraction in the first half, but those expecting growth pushed the average into positive territory.

Consistent with their view that the economy will hit bottom soon, the economists said they expect the Fed to trim its benchmark federal-funds rate by another half percentage point from the current 2.25% by June -- and then to keep rates unchanged for the rest of the year.

Mr. Wyss, of Standard & Poor's, offered some hope for U.S. investors. "I do think the stock market has hit bottom," he said. "It usually bottoms out three to four months before the economy."

Source: Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/public/us

icon url

chichi2

05/06/08 6:32 AM

#29020 RE: bob3 #27725

Breaking News

** UBS Will Cut 5,500 Jobs After $10.9 Billion Loss, Exit Muni Bond Business
** Stocks in Europe, Asia Drop, Led by Swiss Re; U.S. Futures Little Changed
** Swiss Re Profit Drops 53%, More Than Estimates, on CDO-Linked Writedowns
**Goldman's Murti Says $150 to $200 Oil Is `Likely' in Next Six to 24 Months
** Bill Miller, Puzzled by Withdrawn Offer, Predicts Microsoft Will Come Back
** U.K. Services Grow at Slowest Pace in Five Years on Credit-Market Seizures
** Bernanke Urges Banks, Government to Increase Efforts to Stem Foreclosures
** Myanmar Cyclone Killed

Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/index.html?Intro=intro3
icon url

chichi2

07/26/08 1:54 PM

#30692 RE: bob3 #27725

"The American resources on the Atlantic and Pacific coasts contain 14 billion barrels at a minimum ... more than we have imported from the Persian Gulf in the last 15 years," said Sen. Pete Domenici

source WallStJournal (click on replied2Msg for link to Journal)
icon url

chichi2

10/26/08 1:07 PM

#32639 RE: bob3 #27725

Forbes= Several Points well_taken, others maybe_contraversial.

i read all three sections, and found something in each,
of real value. even if you can not agree with all the thoughts,
it made me think of the alternatives and strengthen my resolve.

http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2008/1110/018_1.html

http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2008/1110/018_2.html

http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2008/1110/018_3.html





icon url

chichi2

06/28/09 5:41 PM

#39213 RE: bob3 #27725

Michigan and the Knowledge Economy Manufacturing won't support the middle class.

By WILLIAM MCGURN

With the highest unemployment rate in the nation and two of its Big Three auto makers bankrupt, Michigan could benefit from a dose of Sen. John McCain's tough love.

Instead, it got Vice President Joe Biden bearing $2 billion in stimulus bonds for roads and infrastructure. And that's sad news for anyone hoping to see the emergence of what this depressed state economy needs most: a new middle class for a new century.

At a groundbreaking ceremony for a road project in Kalamazoo, Mich., on Friday, Mr. Biden joined Democratic leaders from Gov. Jennifer Granholm to Sens. Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow in suggesting that prosperity is around the corner. The federal government, he said, was doing all it could to help Michigan "lead us into the 21st century like you did in the 20th century."

Only one small problem. As Mr. McCain so bluntly put it on the eve of last year's Republican primary, "Some jobs that have left Michigan are not coming back. And the answer to that isn't to raise false hopes that somehow we can bring back lost jobs but to create new ones."

Mr. McCain took a lot of grief for those words and ended up losing the primary to Mitt Romney. But Lou Glazer thinks Mr. McCain had it right. Mr. Glazer heads a nonpartisan think tank called Michigan Future. And he advances a simple argument: While the reliance on manufacturing made sense in the 20th century, the sooner we recognize that manufacturing is no longer the key to a prosperous middle class, the better off Michigan will be in the 21st.

"One of the things we do today is look back and say, 'Boy, weren't we stupid to concentrate so much in the auto industry,'" says Mr. Glazer. "But it wasn't stupid then. It's only stupid now."

Mr. Glazer says that the state's most pressing need is to transition to the "knowledge economy," which Michigan Future defines as any industry where the proportion of workers with bachelor's degrees or higher is 30%. That's important, because the knowledge economy is more than the Googles and the Microsofts. The top knowledge industries include information, finance, insurance, professional services, health care and education. Not only are these industries creating jobs, they pay higher wages.

What does this mean for Michigan? It means, for example, that if President Barack Obama is right that the future lies in "building the next generation of clean cars," the most promising part of that future will not be on the factory floor. It will be on the knowledge side, e.g., the engineering department. In many ways, says Mr. Glazer, that's not so different from the heyday of the Big Three, when Detroit was synonymous with innovation.

Ironically, perhaps the greatest challenge to Michigan's transformation is a function of its past success. Until very recently, the auto industry offered those with low educational attainment high-wage jobs. One legacy is that too many Michiganders do not aim for college. And too many of those who do get a college degree end up moving to cities like Chicago, where opportunities are more attractive.

The result is that a state that once laid claim to creating the middle class is fast losing it. As recently as 2000, Michigan ranked 16th in terms of per capita income. Today Michigan ranks 33rd, with its per capita income 11% below the national average -- the lowest it's been since the federal government started keeping figures. Over those same years, Michigan has steadily hemorrhaged jobs.

In other words, even allowing the rosiest assumptions about a restructured GM and the jobs created by the stimulus, Michigan is likely to continue to suffer for some time ahead. The question is whether this suffering will lead to more of the same -- or to a restructuring that provides for a more hopeful future. In this light it's hard to see how priorities at the federal and state level -- e.g., card check in Congress, or raising taxes to meet budget shortfalls in Lansing, Mich. -- do much to address the hard truth Mr. McCain pointed out last year.

The larger point is that what the middle class needs more than anything else is an economy where employers have to compete for their labor. The more open a state's economy is to investment and entrepreneurship, the more employers there will be. And the more education a state's citizens have, the more advanced the industries they can support.

"Both national and state policy are all designed to restoring a broad middle class that is factory based," says Mr. Glazer. "But manufacturing will not be the driver of the middle class. The path to Michigan's prosperity is knowledge."
icon url

chichi2

08/08/09 11:53 AM

#39980 RE: bob3 #27725

Wall Street Journal: link

http://online.wsj.com/public/us


Provided THANKS TO BOB3
icon url

chichi2

08/22/09 8:29 AM

#40228 RE: bob3 #27725

Wall Street Journal: link

http://online.wsj.com/public/us