InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

siriuslyricher

01/15/08 3:01 PM

#97983 RE: optmist #97982

That first photo (upper left) looks more like the SAS-51 (longer nose than the Aerostat). Foreshortening (Foreshortening refers to the visual effect or optical illusion that an object or distance is shorter than it actually is because it is angled toward the viewer.), could make the airship appear more "square" (like the Aerostat) at certain angles.

Also, I reviewed the last video of the SAS-51, and at certain angles you only view 3 of the 4 fins.

Finally, it does appear untethered to me. From your description of its movements, you did not believe it was tethered.

Do you recall precisely what the Isreali papers said about the aerial surveillance of Bush's visit?
icon url

Mt bigsky

01/15/08 3:34 PM

#97990 RE: optmist #97982

These photos do not show a SAS-51. Wish they were, but they are not.

It's time will come though.
icon url

serious1

01/15/08 4:07 PM

#97994 RE: optmist #97982

Thank you so much optmist great stuff!!!
icon url

p944na

01/15/08 4:18 PM

#97996 RE: optmist #97982

I will add an asterisk to the it looks like a common aerostat statement. It does look like a common aerostat*.


* - Common aerostats are generally pitched up nose positive to handle blow down (wind gusts). Airships generally fly near zero pitch angle or angle of attack. The vehicle in your pictures looks like it is mostly at zero pitch angle. hmmm.
icon url

rwehapi2003

01/16/08 7:30 AM

#98009 RE: optmist #97982

Here is a link to a PDF document from Talcom which describes an aerostat product which is deployed in Israel (pages 17-19). Their version is tethered, but based on the description of the transport and deployment logistics, you can imagine the improved functionailty of an untethered version.

http://www.talcom.co.il/talcom.pdf

It's a WAG to think Sanswire/TAO is involved with any of this, but you never know.