InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

fordgonracn

01/05/08 6:53 AM

#20834 RE: Fred Kadiddlehopper #20833

I keep hearing CARNES is toxic, CARNES is badd, CARNES etc. etc. How many of these past examples did CARNES own 40% of a REAL viable company? and i STRESS 40% because it is not a controlling interest.( I do not know these answers)But i do know the facts, qualifacations and reputation of THIS company and PETER COLLORAFI and these are the things that i base my current loyalty to RVGD on.(i will not"marry" this or any company) and i know that it is a start-up with many issues and hurdles to overcome which takes time and patience, so i will give them this time."IF" I see that they are not holding their end of the bargain up I will be out. But i am nowhere near this point at this time. But i guess what i am saying is "past" performance of "CARNES" does not weigh heavily on my decision here! GLTU and all
icon url

Jestiron

01/05/08 9:54 AM

#20871 RE: Fred Kadiddlehopper #20833

Could you please send me some support for this claim?

The terms of the funding by Carnes were published, werent they? Ill look againm, but I didnt recall seeing anything that suggested toxicity.
icon url

GordonGecko

01/05/08 12:20 PM

#20922 RE: Fred Kadiddlehopper #20833

thanks for your inputs appreciate it.