News Focus
News Focus
icon url

skunksyard

09/27/07 1:09 PM

#30021 RE: keegers #30008

"One is not. "

yup and the one that is not due to licensing...the 120mil shares was my original question. What % is that of the total # of shares. That question is clear to me, very clear. In all the responses to me it has not been answered but folks did try to answer it factually with their assumptions and that's what gets folks into trouble

Let's stay with the facts about this company and what they told us, not take what we want to hear and make it a fact.
icon url

Stratey

09/27/07 1:09 PM

#30022 RE: keegers #30008

Maybe I'm on ignore by a bunch of you since I never really got a reply from my comment, so now I'll make the comment again, then ask a question...

Royalty agreements are paid out normally based on revenues generated on the product...not on profits. This is not standard in my eye. The payout should be based on the business generated by the product...not tied to how the company is run administratively. If the company decides to pay its executives millions of dollars a year i bonuses, that comes out of the bottom line...and our payment.


Q.

Why is the agreement based on profits and not revenues? Do you think the PR may be worded incorrectly and the payouts ARE based on revenues?


Thanks in advance,