Replies to post #320 on Competitive Companies Inc. (fka CCOP)

[NUFSED]

1. My source confirms

a. If it’s true rumors that: business deals benefiting CCOP are better than any time in company history and much better than postings in chat rooms, (many of which my source may be involved in various ways). My source and I feel this is consistent with the company’s previously stated goals and objectives.

b. If it’s true rumors that: all announcements we’ve been expecting are being temporarily withheld for various legal, strategic and tactical reasons that will become self-evident within several weeks. It’s been my source’s many decades of experience that this is how it often works.

c. If it’s true rumors that: near future liquidity is likely better than most realize, including that there are plenty of small people ($5-10K transactions) holding “insider shares” (possibly totaling well over $300,000) that can have liquidity anytime by re-registering their shares and, if/when these people want to pull any principle out, they’ll most likely only sell daily enough to pull out principle (usually in small installments), while timing it with various newsletter mail-outs, this could provide liquidity in smooth ways, beneficial to all shareholders.

d. It true, the rumors the small (couple of hundred thousand dollar) private placement you’re referring to is restricted stock done in accordance with applicable laws – it’s likely this type of cash typically goes for key strategic capital and/or bridge capital and/or mezzanine financing. This makes excellent business sense and benefits all shareholders, especially those buyers now.

e. My source with nearly three decades of experience (who may also be doing many things with related entities) is of the considered opinion your comment in post 319 regarding a 10 to 1 forward split is about “as likely as immediate lasting world peace and unanimous agreement of all religions and political parties throughout the world”, unless people with confidential/ private information “not yet public info” prematurely (i.e., without permission by all sides and related filings/press releases, in accordance with applicable laws) about things in the works.

f. So far prior postings appear OK based on previous applicable company communications and
press releases. It’s important that we keep it that way.

g. With respect to talking about that which is in the pubic domain (and OK to discuss at this
time), I’d enjoy a response from LGL, Metrolane, Pokerdv8 & others to my prior postings.