InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

internet

04/26/07 12:59 PM

#143109 RE: julesg #143105

julesg..."loss of data from hard drive failure happens several orders of magnitude more often than loss or theft of a laptop" Excuse me for budding in...but you're comparing apples ith oranges. The DIFFERENCE is that if your hard drive fails...you have not COMPROMISED anyones personal data....if your laptop is stolen....you've now potentially compromised ALL the data that was on your laptop to someone who may the misuse that info. The corporate liability for the later is potentially in the millions of dollars per lost or stolen laptop.

Sincerely,

Jas
icon url

bbigtim

04/26/07 4:04 PM

#143139 RE: julesg #143105

julesg/False Choice

There is no reason that I know of that full drive encryption technology could not be applied to non-mechanical storage media. There is also no question that software encryption does not provide as much protection for data stored on portable media as hardware based full drive encryption. As non-mechanical drives with sufficient capacity to hold a robust operating system and related application data become feasible, they can be augmented to include hardware based encryption.

Perhaps your IT guy is making a rational decision for now. Maybe your company's employees just don't carry around that much sensitive information. However, its just as likely that your IT guy is enamored by flash technology and doesn't understand the vulnerabilty of software based encryption.

Any company whose employees carry highly sensitive data (e.g. financial data, identity data, trade secrets) on portable devices is being highly irrational not to use a Seagate type solution as soon as it is available. Perhaps the NSA could recover data from such a device, but even the most ingeniuous criminals or corporate espionage types are not going to get anything. The value of being able to just write off a stolen device and move on is hard to calculate.