News Focus
News Focus
icon url

FeMike

08/20/25 1:03 PM

#782651 RE: barnstormer #782649

How good is your track record?



Way, way better than his.

I'd bet I can find 5 of his errors for every one of mine. Care to point out some of mine?

What's more, most of my errors are predictions, estimates, opinions that I state as much. When he makes errors, he presents them as facts. Using fake NWBio quotes to prove his 'facts'. Making up regulatory 'rules'.

He only concedes he is wrong when a fellow NWBO 'pumper' calls him out on something. For instance, when he tried to say that DCVax-L is almost certainly currently under FDA review under a program that has not even begun reviewing applicants, and approval news for that could come within the next two months, which is patently incorrect - I called him out twice on that (with actual links and facts to back it up) and he still has not 'admitted and apologized' for that absolute fallacy.

He also said, as a matter of fact, that as of July 15th NWBO was internally approved and halfway through the labeling process and we would have approval news and NICE submission by August 12th. He has yet to admit he was wrong about that.
icon url

learningcurve2020

08/20/25 1:06 PM

#782652 RE: barnstormer #782649

Didn’t see it apologize for saying NWBO owned Advent. Can you point us to that post please.
icon url

exwannabe

08/20/25 1:30 PM

#782659 RE: barnstormer #782649

Slave's heavy use of AI for his posts has admittedly led to some errors. Overall, I would estimate the percentage of errors is fairly low and to his credit he has admitted and apologized for them when pointed out. How good is your track record?


Disagree.

He has been corrected on his assertion that NICE requires a final SmPC when they clearly only require a draft SmPC. Yet he has posted this false assertion dozens of times after that.,

From the link he himself provided:

1.1 SmPC
Include the (draft) SmPC for pharmaceuticals or information for use (IFU) for devices in appendix A.



On another issue, Slave asserted 2 quotes from this years 10K and Q1 10Q that did not exist in any form.. When Jerry C pointed this out Slave lashed out at Jerry saying he was deceptive. Jerry should have searched other documents for the quotes. Then Slave produced a different quote from a 2022 SEC submission and a non-existent quote from the last ASM.

But far worse than these were his medical errors that were not AI.

. He asserted -L was based on allogenic lysate, and that was very adamant that it is, not could be. He never admitted he was wrong, just made a "clarification" that was clearly not what he was saying in the mistake. He also asserted Direct used lysate.

. His assertion Merck makes no live virus vaccine is just bizarre for a doctor. They actually make a half dozen, including something called MMR (mumps, measels, rubella) which is something I would think most doctors would know of even if not a GP. But it gets worse. He asserted Oncovir was classified as a "live virus" because it mimics a virus. You got to be kidding me. All vaccines mimic a virus in some form. A live virus means what it says, and Oncovir is not even a dead vaccine or fragment thereof.

Those are not AI mistakes.
icon url

manibiotech

08/20/25 1:37 PM

#782661 RE: barnstormer #782649

So define track record .Sonpoint us to which predictions have been accurate .
icon url

RobotDroid

08/20/25 1:45 PM

#782666 RE: barnstormer #782649

100% wrong and shows your not a truth teller.