Pointing to the shortcomings of other treatments doesn’t excuse the deficiencies of an application like Anavex’s. Each submission must stand on its own merits, as we've seen with previous EMA reviews of monoclonal antibody applications.
I didn’t find the abstract in order to disparage the mabs , I was looking for insight as to what chimp might ask. I think the risk reward benefit of Blarcamesine warrants EU approval, we’ll see.