Replies to post #364000 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[THall]

DBMM Truthers say a $650K+ liability discrepancy is just… a typo 🤡

Page 4 of Q3 says Accounts Payable = $81,667
But Note 11? Says it’s $731,667 in professional fees alone 🤯

But no worries, they say:

“That’s irrelevant. The update is clear.”
Translation: “Just ignore the numbers — trust the narrative!”

This is the same crowd that yells "Howling at the moon!" any time someone reads an SEC filing and points out DBMM has:
🔹 No revenue growth
🔹 No new clients
🔹 No biz model
🔹 10+ yrs of dilution & fantasy PRs

But sure, tell us again how only “real shareholders” can understand these mystical “updates.”

Here's the reality:
The Q3 contradicts itself.
The cult defense is laughable.
You can't magic away a $650K liability with gaslighting.

Bashers aren’t howling — we’re reading. You should try it sometime.

#DBMM #OTC #DilutionMachine #PinkDelusions #SECfilingFacts

[Jetmek_03052]

Poo - that is the HIEGHT of stupidness!

I don't care HOW many times the number is stated or WHERE it is stated!

The number you quote ($81,766) is the stated sum of the US and GB 9-month revenues in DBMM's filing! But the 9-month revenue figures quoted on page 14 DO NOT ADD UP TO THAT FIGURE! They add up to $71,766. So - either they were added up incorrectly or DBMM has mis-stated the revenue figures for either the US or for GB.

WHICH IS IT???

Your constant "insisting" that the figures are correct does not matter in the face of simple math! YOU ARE WRONG! And it is making you look like a FOOL!

Now - quit defecating out of your mouth!

If 2+2 still equals 4?

THEN:

$20,340 + $51,327 equals $71,766! NOT $81,766.

Figure it out.