Replies to post #240 on NeuroSense Therapeutics Ltd (NRSN)

[johnhancoque]

Having an opinion is subjective. You can only be wrong if you state facts or falsehoods which I have not. Learn the difference between the two and you'll do o.k. I simply stated what you said is inherently incorrect. If Alon Ben Noon knew when the partnership would come to fruition he wouldn't have stated first quarter matter of factly. You infer he knows when it will or won't come based on a feeling about a letter of which I might add conveys 0 emotion or ques of anything other than he literally doesn't know anything about anything. Simply put, the letter doesn't state anything about timeliness. The partnership could be announced tomorrow morning as a matter of fact as ive stated and neither him or his dog would have known better. My ultimate point is I don't trust him because of his inexperience in this matter and giving the markets timeliness which he ought never to have done put a bad taste in my mouth. I'm not giving him any more credence than I am you. In fact he has less because of his position of authority and he needs to earn shareholders trust whereas I couldn't care less to earn yours or mine yours. You can't know to say with validity that that letter to shareholders had any sway wheather or not a partnership would be signed in the next 5 minutes or 5 months. For all he or we know they may have phoned in right after the PR and said let's get this thing done. Nobody knows sht

[johnhancoque]

Having an opinion is subjective. You can only be wrong if you state facts or falsehoods which I have not. Learn the difference between the two and you'll do o.k. I simply stated what you said is inherently incorrect. If Alon Ben Noon knew when the partnership would come to fruition he wouldn't have stated first quarter matter of factly. You infer he knows when it will or won't come based on a feeling about a letter of which I might add conveys 0 emotion or ques of anything other than he literally doesn't know anything about anything. Simply put, the letter doesn't state anything about timeliness. The partnership could be announced tomorrow morning as a matter of fact as ive stated and neither him or his dog would have known better. My ultimate point is I don't trust him because of his inexperience in this matter and giving the markets timeliness which he ought never to have done put a bad taste in my mouth. I'm not giving him any more credence than I am you. In fact he has less because of his position of authority and he needs to earn shareholders trust whereas I couldn't care less to earn yours or mine yours. You can't know to say with validity that that letter to shareholders had any sway wheather or not a partnership would be signed in the next 5 minutes or 5 months. For all he or we know they may have phoned in right after the PR and said let's get this thing done. Nobody knows sht