News Focus
News Focus
icon url

HGiLS

11/30/24 11:56 AM

#416169 RE: WeeZuhl #416167

You missed the part where the CFO told the CEO we can’t afford to pay for half the adderall and the CEO agreed to pay sungen the amount they wanted for half the adderall.

So thank you CEO to step in using mikah.

No conflict. Just a ceo who puts his money where his mouth is.

If I was you, and I had so many issues with the CEO saving this company because it is not ethical, I would sell all my shares.

Where is YOUR integrity wheezy?
icon url

HGiLS

11/30/24 1:17 PM

#416173 RE: WeeZuhl #416167

The deal is done. There are no decisions to make.

The partner gets 50% of the profit and goes to bed.

Don’t try to create a story about a tax. This is a pure profit split like we had with sungen.

Tax is what you will pay the government when you sell your stock if you made a profit.

Go back to basics wheezy
icon url

jammy32

11/30/24 11:47 PM

#416183 RE: WeeZuhl #416167

Nasrat had insight into future adderal volume when he decided to buy out sungen. The question is what would he have done if the iSight showed that adderal was slowing down. He would have not bought out sungen.

The optics here are terrible. Conflict is terrible.

Just my opinion
icon url

Just give me $1.50

03/29/25 9:44 AM

#423816 RE: WeeZuhl #416167

We want the Adderalls, but what if NasRAT phucks us in the Ask on the purchase price?

He's not going to tell us how much he initially paid for them, and we may never even know how much Elite paid if we purchase them.

Are we PHUCKED either way?

1. He keeps the Adderalls we're PHUCKED - No additional revenue.

2. He sells them to Elite we're PHUCKED - Don't know how much he initially paid for them.

Repeal the Mikah Tax.