InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Steady_T

07/01/24 4:53 PM

#463118 RE: tredenwater2 #463117

The preponderance of evidence is that Anavex is in a very good position. It may not be WGT. However, it is looking pretty darn good.
icon url

poguemahone

07/01/24 4:57 PM

#463119 RE: tredenwater2 #463117

An overactive placebo group did their bidding for them? Does this also explain why our CEO hasn’t made a self-imposed deadline in 9 years? Or makes asinine and arrogant claims about only needing 3 trial participants to measure a drug’s effectiveness? Boy, Missling really looks like a genius after the Rett readout, once he removes the egg yolk from his face.

You are delusional, so this board welcomes you with open arms.
icon url

boi568

07/01/24 5:23 PM

#463122 RE: tredenwater2 #463117

"Big money gets in one way or another, and cheap. When their normal tools don't work they resort to other measures like an SEC investigation etc. In our case we had an over active placebo group that did their bidding for them and down we went."

That is some high-level conspiracy thinking. How much do you think "they" paid the placebo group to do their bidding for them? (Especially since by corruptly tanking the trial, those parents actively harmed their own sick children; "they" must have paid a lot to them and also to the CRO to break the blinding of the placebo group.)
icon url

BIOChecker4

07/01/24 6:12 PM

#463124 RE: tredenwater2 #463117

When I refer to the dwindling number of WGTers who still refuse to face the reality that Missling isn’t up to the task, you are one of the people on the list. You’ll come around eventually, just like so many others have.
icon url

LakeshoreLeo1953

07/01/24 7:21 PM

#463127 RE: tredenwater2 #463117

If you are going to use a link from another poster for your statistics,

You may wish to quote them accurately let alone understand the insider ownership significance of the numbers.