InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

GetSeriousOK

04/25/24 8:36 AM

#15575 RE: Pacjd #15574

bullshit. GIUL won't have grounds to sue Guided Therapeutics if defendants don't pay.

Guided Therapeutics can't be held liable for the actions of Shenghou, not back then, not now.

And to think - if GIUL had just read the contract before signing it.... who signs a contract without reading it? I'm not a lawyer but I know enough to read a contract before signing it.

And now GIUL is accusing BOTH Blumberg and Faupel of perjury? What is the purpose of making those accusations here? Seems malicious and libelous. I wonder what the judge will say about THIS.
icon url

GetSeriousOK

04/25/24 9:18 AM

#15576 RE: Pacjd #15574

You present GIUL as a savvy legal expert who was wronged by Shenghou.

But how savvy is GIUL, considering that:

* GIUL signed that contract without reading it.
* GIUL initially sued Faupel and Blumberg for 10 counts, but the court threw out six of those before the case went to court.
* When the case went to court, the judge then threw out GIUL's conspiracy claims, leaving only three counts remaining.

https://masslawyersweekly.com/files/2024/03/09-024-24.pdf

I understand that this is common in law -- throw a bunch of spaghetti against a wall and see what sticks -- but getting seven out of 10 counts thrown out doesn't give me much confidence in GIUL.

And the trial changed from a jury trial to a Directed trial -- at whose request was that done, GIUL or Shenghou?

Regardless -- Guided Therapeutics is not a party to the case and so there are no claims in the case against Guided Therapeutics. I have no doubt that if GIUL loses the remaining three counts, GIUL will throw more spaghetti against the wall and bring more lawsuits, but this forum is a poor place to whine and complain about how poorly GIUL was treated and abused. A savvy legal expert would find a better way to air grievances.