InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

shots60

01/27/24 3:36 PM

#162734 RE: Drugdoctor #162733

LOL!!!!
icon url

wulfs

01/27/24 3:50 PM

#162735 RE: Drugdoctor #162733

Thank you for proving my point. None of that information is relevant in the slightest to the facts. Don't pretend that you care about account age, time between posts, followers, etc. You don't. You would have no issue with those things if a user was pumping the stock. It's very obvious that you don't like seeing information that you disagree with and cannot refute. It's quite clear that growing number of people agree with this information, and you especially don't like that, hence the claims of "bot", "duplicate account", "paid basher", "troll", etc. Those are convenient coping mechanisms.

Now would you like to try again? Do you have a legitimate counterargument to this information about the stock and the points being made on topic? Yes or no? Or would you prefer childish name calling and deflections to irrelevant matters?
icon url

Tomorrowneverknows

01/27/24 3:52 PM

#162736 RE: Drugdoctor #162733

lol fools
Bullish
Bullish